CBDT amends jurisdiction of DIT(Intelligence & Criminal Investigation) Lucknow & Kanpur
MINSTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
Notification No. 5/2024
New Delhi, the 6th June, 2024
S.O. 2209(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S.O. 3125 (E), dated the 10th December, 2014, namely:-
In the said notification, in Schedule-II,-
(i) against Sl. No. 9, in column (4), the words, letters and brackets “in the State of Uttar Pradesh which
will be coterminous with the jurisdiction of Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, UP (East)” shall be omitted;
(ii) against Sl. No. 10, in column (4), for the existing entries, the following entries shall be substituted,
namely: –
| (4) |
|
“(a) Areas within the limits of following revenue Districts (including any district carved out from these subsequently) of: (i) Kanpur Nagar (b) the State of Uttarakhand” |
This notification shall come into force with effect from the 06th day of June, 2024.
[F. No. 187/6/2024 (ITA-I)]
VIKAS SINGH, Director (ITA-I)
Note : The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II. Section 3, sub-section (ii), vide notification S.O. 3125 (E), dated the 10th December, 2014.
- AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT
- FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied
- Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company
- Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court
- High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA
