CBDT clarification on requirement of Income tax clearance certificate

CBDT issues clarification in respect of Income tax clearance certificate (ITCC). All Indian citizens not required obtain ITCC before leaving the country.

CBDT issues clarification in respect of Income-tax clearance certificate (ITCC). Section 230 (1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) relates to obtaining of a tax clearance certificate, in certain circumstances, by persons domiciled in India at the time of his departure from India.  The said provision, as it stands, came on the statute through the Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 1.6.2003.

The Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 has made only an amendment in Section 230(1A) of the Act, vide which, reference of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 ( the ‘Black Money Act’) has been inserted in the said Section. This insertion has been made to also cover the liabilities under the Black Money Act in the same manner as the liabilities under the Income-tax Act,1961 and other Acts dealing with direct taxes for the purpose of Section 230(1A) of the Income-tax Act,1961.

CBDT has issued a Press Release stating that due to incorrect interpretation of the said amendment, a mis-information is being erroneously reported that all Indian citizens must obtain income-tax clearance certificate (ITCC) before leaving the country. This position is factually incorrect.

CBDT has clarified that as per section 230 of the Act, every person is not required to obtain a tax clearance certificate. Only certain persons, in respect of whom circumstances exist which make it necessary to obtain a tax clearance certificate, are required to obtain the said certificate. This position has been in the statute since 2003 and remains unchanged even with the amendments vide Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024.

In this context, the CBDT, vide its Instruction No. 1/2004, dated 05.02.2004, has specified that the tax clearance certificate under Section 230(1A) of the Act, may be required to be obtained by persons domiciled in India only in the following circumstances:

(i) where the person is involved in serious financial irregularities and his presence is necessary in investigation of cases under the Income-tax Act or the Wealth-tax Act and it is likely that a tax demand will be raised against him, or

(ii) where the person has direct tax arrears exceeding Rs. 10 lakh outstanding against him which have not been stayed by any authority.

Further, a person can be asked to obtain a tax clearance certificate only after recording the reasons for the same and after taking approval from the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax or Chief Commissioner of Income-tax.

In view thereof, CBDT has reiterated that the ITCC under Section 230(1A) of the Act, is needed by residents domiciled in India, only in rare cases, such as (a) where a person is involved in serious financial irregularities or (b) where a tax demand of more than Rs. 10 lakh is pending which is not stayed by any authority.

• CPC was not justified in making the disallowance u/s 40a(ia) for non deduction of TDS
• No addition when cash deposited in bank was available as cash in hand in the books
• Use of word “can” in arbitration clause not a binding arbitration agreement –SC
• Loan repayments for assets acquisition not deductible for determining maintenance to wife
• Supreme Court explains distinction between seat and venue of arbitration