Income Tax

CBDT exempts income of Haryana Labour Welfare Board u/s 10(46)

CBDT exempts income of Haryana Labour Welfare Board u/s 10(46) from 01-06-2020 to 31-03-2021 and for FY 2021-2022 to 2024-25

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 80/2021

New Delhi, the 14th July, 2021

S.O. 2826(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies for the purposes of the said clause, ‘Haryana Labour Welfare Board’ (PAN AAATH2451C), a Board constituted by the State Government of Haryana, in respect of the following specified income arising to that Board, namely:-

(a) Contribution to the Labour Welfare Fund by the Employers and Employees;

(b) Unpaid accumulation which were due to employees but not paid to them within a period of 2 years by the Employer;

(c) Fine on delayed deposit of contribution and unpaid accumulation;

(d) Interest on loans and advances given to staff of the board; and

(e) Interest income received from investment.

2. This notification shall be effective subject to the conditions that Haryana Labour Welfare Board,-

(a) shall not engage in any commercial activity;

(b) activities and the nature of the specified income shall remain unchanged throughout the financial years; and

(c) shall file return of income in accordance with the provision of clause (g) of sub-section (4C) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

(d) shall file the Audit report along with the Return, duly verified by the accountant as provided in explanation to section 288(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 along with a certificate from the chartered accountant that the above conditions are satisfied.

3. This notification shall apply for the period from 01-06-2020 to 31-03-2021 in the financial year 2020-2021 and also from the financial years 2021-2022, 2022-2023, 2023-2024 and 2024-2025.[F.No.300196/30/2018-ITA-I]

PRAJNA PARAMITA, Director

Explanatory Memorandum: It is certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to this notification.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

3 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

7 days ago