New Tax Regime u/s 115BAC for TDS. Employee to intimate employer his intention. CBDT

Clarification in respect of option u/s 115BAC regarding TDS. Employee to intimate employer his intention for each previous year. CBDT Circular C1 of 2020

Circular C1 of 2020

F. No. 370142/13/2020-TPL
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
*****

New Delhi, April 13, 2020

Clarification in respect of option under section 115BAC of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Section 115BAC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), inserted by the Finance Act, 2020 w.e.f. the assessment year 2021-22, inter alia, provides that a person, being an individual or a Hindu undivided family having income other than income from business or profession, may exercise option in respect of a previous year to be taxed under the said section 115BAC along with his return of income to be furnished under sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Act for each year. The concessional rate provided under section 115BAC of the Act is subject to the condition that the total income shall be computed without specified exemption or deduction, set­ off of loss and additional depreciation.

2. Representations expressing concern regarding tax to be deducted at source (TDS) has been received stating that as the option is required to be exercised at the time of filing of return, the deductor, being an employer, would not know if the person , being an employee, would opt for taxation under section 115BAC of the Act or not. However, there is lack of clarity regarding whether the provisions of section 115BC of the Act are to be considered at the time of deducting tax.

3. In order to avoid the genuine hardship in such cases, the Board, in exercise of powers conferred under section 119 of the Act , hereby clarifies that an employee, having income other than the income under the head “profit and gains of business or profession” and intending to opt for the concessional rate under section 115BAC of the Act, may intimate the deductor, being his employer, of such intention for each previous year and upon such intimation, the deductor shall compute his total income, and make TDS thereon in accordance with the provisions of section 115BAC of the Act. If such intimation is not made by the employee, the employer shall make TDS without considering the provision of section  115BAC of the Act.

4. It is also clarified that the intimation so made to the deductor shall be only for the purposes of TDS during the previous year and cannot be modified during that However, the intimation would not amount to exercising option in terms of sub-section (5) of section 115BAC of the Act and the person shall be required to do so alongwith the return to be furnished under sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Act for that previous year. Thus, option at the time of filing of return of income under sub-section (I) of section 139 of the Act could be different from the intimation made by such employee to the employer for that previous year.

5. Further, in case of a person who has income under the head “profit and gains of business or profession” also, the option for taxation under section 115BAC of the Act once exercised for a previous year at the time of filing of return of income under sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Act cannot be changed for subsequent previous years except in certain circumstances. 

Accordingly , the above clarification would apply to such per son with a modification that the intimation to the employer in his abcaus.in case for subsequent previous years must not deviate from the option under section 115BAC of the Act once exercised in a previous year.

(Niraj Kumar)
Deputy Secretary (TPL) -I

Download Circular Click Here >>

• Audit Fee to be received only by digital modes/banking channels -ICAI revises Ethics
• Demand set aside as assessee for period covered had discharged tax liability under SVLDRS
• No addition u/s 68 when there is no fresh receipt of unsecured loans during the year
• Taxes on sales comprising in turnover to be excluded for estimating net profit
• Capital contribution deposited in assessee’s bank not partnership firm – Addition 69A upheld