ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification.

In a recent judgment, ITAT Lucknow allowed benefit of CBDT retrospective notification enhancing the exemption u/s 10(10A) to Rs. 25 lakhs to non-government employees also.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
5074 (2026) (03) abcaus.in ITAT

In the instant case the appellant assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the action of CPC in restricting exemption under section 10(10AA) to Rs. 3,00,000.

The appellant assessee was an individual and a retired employee of a Nationalised Bank (PNB). The assessee filed his return of income for the A.Y. 2020-21 claiming the whole amount of leave encashment received u/s 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

While processing the return filed by the assessee, the Assessing Officer (AO) restricted the same to Rs. 3,00,000/- and added to the total income. Being aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A) who vide impugned appellate order dismissed the assessee’s appeal.

During the course of hearing before the Tribunal, the assessee submitted that CBDT had issued Notification No. 31/2023/F/No. 200/3/2023-ITA-I dated 24.05.2023 whereby the benefit in terms of section 10(10AA) of the Act has been extended to non-government employees, by raising the limit to Rs. 25 lakhs.

The assessee further submitted that the aforesaid notification was applicable with retrospective effect. He also submitted that the issue was covered in favour of the assessee by numerous orders of ITAT.

The Tribunal observed that it was not in dispute that the subject matter of the appeal was covered in assessee’s favour by numerous orders of ITAT. No precedent was brought to knowledge of the Bench by Revenue side, contrary to the view taken in assessee’s favour by aforesaid orders of ITAT.

In view of the foregoing, the Tribunal allowed the grounds raised by the assessee and the AO was directed to allow the claim of the assessee u/s 10(10AA) of the Act, in accordance with notification of CBDT, which is applicable with retrospective effect.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

• CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.
• Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC
• CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price
• Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities
• No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT