Income Tax

No coercive steps for recovery of disputed tax amount as the Tribunal were non functional

Income Tax Department prevented to take coercive steps for recovery of disputed tax amount as the Tribunal at Allahabad and Varanasi were non functional

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2622 (2018) (11) HC

Several appeals of the petitioner(s) for the various assessment years were pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad. During the pendency of these appeals, the Income Tax Department initiated recovery proceedings against the petitioners to recover the disputed amount of tax. 

Aggrieved by the action of the Department, the Petitioners approached the Hon’ble High Court by filing a Writ Petition.

The submission of the Petitioners was that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad was non functional and as such they were unable to get the appeals decided or to obtain any interim order therein. 

The Income Tax Department accepted that the Tribunal at Allahabad and Varanasi are not functioning but submitted that if there was any urgency, petitioner may move application before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow for the transfer of appeals and get them heard or move applications for grant of interim protection therein.

The Hon’ble High Court, in view of the facts and circumstances that the appeals of the petitioners were pending and not being considered for the non functioning of ITATs, permitted the petitioner(s) to make appropriate applications before the ITAT Lucknow for transfer of appeal so that the same may be heard expeditiously, or some other place having jurisdiction as may be directed.

The Hon’ble High Court stated that the petitioners are also at liberty to move applications for interim protection in the appeals and it the Tribunal, where the appeals are transferred shall consider the same on priority or the appeals if possible within a period of six weeks. 
Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court directed that for a period of six weeks or till the consideration of the stay application of the petitioner in the appeals or the appeals on merit, whichever is earlier, the Income Tax Department shall not take any coercive steps for the realization of disputed amount of tax.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Read Also:
High Pitched Scrutiny Assessment-Concerned AO to be transferred and no coercive action for recovery-CBDT Chairman Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Allowability of depreciation on highway project awarded on DBOT basis

ITAT allows depreciation on highway project awarded on DBOT basis In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi allows depreciation on highway…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Once assessee satisfies conditions u/s 270AA, AO is bound to grant immunity

Once assessee satisfies conditions mentioned in section 270AA, the Assessing Officer would be bound to grant immunity In a recent…

12 hours ago
  • CA CS CMA

NTPC invites applications from CA/CMA as Executive Trainee. Last date: 27.01.2026

NTPC invited applications from CA/CMA as young professionals to join NTPC Projects/Stations as Executive Trainee, Finance. NTPC Limited has invited…

13 hours ago
  • GST

Allahabad HC disposes GST appeals as functioning of GST Tribunal put to motion

Allahabad High Court disposes GST appeals observing that the functioning of GST Appellate Tribunal are put to motion Allahabad High…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Date of dispatch of notice as per ITBA portal and date of email may not be same – ITAT

Date of dispatch of notice as per ITBA portal and date of communication by email may not necessarily be the…

14 hours ago
  • GST

Assignment of leasehold rights not amount to supply of service under GST Act.

In a recent judgment, Bombay High Court held that assignment of leasehold rights for consideration would not amount to supply…

18 hours ago