Income Tax

No coercive steps for recovery of disputed tax amount as the Tribunal were non functional

Income Tax Department prevented to take coercive steps for recovery of disputed tax amount as the Tribunal at Allahabad and Varanasi were non functional

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2622 (2018) (11) HC

Several appeals of the petitioner(s) for the various assessment years were pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad. During the pendency of these appeals, the Income Tax Department initiated recovery proceedings against the petitioners to recover the disputed amount of tax. 

Aggrieved by the action of the Department, the Petitioners approached the Hon’ble High Court by filing a Writ Petition.

The submission of the Petitioners was that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad was non functional and as such they were unable to get the appeals decided or to obtain any interim order therein. 

The Income Tax Department accepted that the Tribunal at Allahabad and Varanasi are not functioning but submitted that if there was any urgency, petitioner may move application before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow for the transfer of appeals and get them heard or move applications for grant of interim protection therein.

The Hon’ble High Court, in view of the facts and circumstances that the appeals of the petitioners were pending and not being considered for the non functioning of ITATs, permitted the petitioner(s) to make appropriate applications before the ITAT Lucknow for transfer of appeal so that the same may be heard expeditiously, or some other place having jurisdiction as may be directed.

The Hon’ble High Court stated that the petitioners are also at liberty to move applications for interim protection in the appeals and it the Tribunal, where the appeals are transferred shall consider the same on priority or the appeals if possible within a period of six weeks. 
Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court directed that for a period of six weeks or till the consideration of the stay application of the petitioner in the appeals or the appeals on merit, whichever is earlier, the Income Tax Department shall not take any coercive steps for the realization of disputed amount of tax.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Read Also:
High Pitched Scrutiny Assessment-Concerned AO to be transferred and no coercive action for recovery-CBDT Chairman Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

4 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

5 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

1 week ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

1 week ago