Income Tax Department prevented to take coercive steps for recovery of disputed tax amount as the Tribunal at Allahabad and Varanasi were non functional
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2622 (2018) (11) HC
Several appeals of the petitioner(s) for the various assessment years were pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad. During the pendency of these appeals, the Income Tax Department initiated recovery proceedings against the petitioners to recover the disputed amount of tax.
Aggrieved by the action of the Department, the Petitioners approached the Hon’ble High Court by filing a Writ Petition.
The submission of the Petitioners was that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad was non functional and as such they were unable to get the appeals decided or to obtain any interim order therein.
The Income Tax Department accepted that the Tribunal at Allahabad and Varanasi are not functioning but submitted that if there was any urgency, petitioner may move application before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow for the transfer of appeals and get them heard or move applications for grant of interim protection therein.
The Hon’ble High Court, in view of the facts and circumstances that the appeals of the petitioners were pending and not being considered for the non functioning of ITATs, permitted the petitioner(s) to make appropriate applications before the ITAT Lucknow for transfer of appeal so that the same may be heard expeditiously, or some other place having jurisdiction as may be directed.
The Hon’ble High Court stated that the petitioners are also at liberty to move applications for interim protection in the appeals and it the Tribunal, where the appeals are transferred shall consider the same on priority or the appeals if possible within a period of six weeks.
Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court directed that for a period of six weeks or till the consideration of the stay application of the petitioner in the appeals or the appeals on merit, whichever is earlier, the Income Tax Department shall not take any coercive steps for the realization of disputed amount of tax.
Read Also:
High Pitched Scrutiny Assessment-Concerned AO to be transferred and no coercive action for recovery-CBDT Chairman Click Here >>
Every resolution plan to include a statement of beneficial-ownership of all natural persons who ultimately owns or controls the resolution…
Change in the address of Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad with effect from 11.12.2025 Ministry of Finance(Department of Financial Service)…
Updated list of banks authorised by Reserve Bank of India to import only gold for FY 2025-26 with effect from…
Under percentage completion method, selling/Admin costs are allowable despite no revenue declared as per guidance note of ICAI. In a…
AO cannot use reverse computation of gross payment using TDS amount to determine the amount disallowable u/s 40(a)(ia) - ITAT…
Once loans were repaid in subsequent assessment years with cogent evidences then the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax…