For difference of receipts as per 26AS and books of account, only embedded portion of profits can be added to the income
ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3540 (2021) (08) ITAT
In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) towards undisclosed income.
During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO found that as per the ITS details the gross receipts of the assessee is higher than the amount as per the profit and loss account. The assessee was asked to reconcile the difference in receipts. Since, no plausible explanation was provided by the assessee, the said amount of said difference was determined as undisclosed and added to the income of the assessee.
Before the Tribunal the assessee contended that at the time of scrutiny he was in bonafide belief that the excess amount and TDS thereon as reflected in 26AS Statement does not belong to him and thus, it had not claimed these amounts in its ITR.
The assessee pleaded that the Revenue was not justified to treat the entire amount as the income without appreciating that the rate of profit at the most which could be brought to tax in the contract receipts.
According to the assessee, the Assessing Officer should have added back not the total receipts treating as income but only at the average profit ratio in the last three years.
The Tribunal stated that it is a settled proposition of law that in case of difference between the assessees books of account and as per the TDS certificate, then on the said difference, the only embedded portion of the profits is to be taken into consideration and addition is to be made thereon.
The Tribunal stated that there are number of judicial pronouncements by which the principle to this effect has been laid down that the total sale cannot represent as the profit of the assessee.
According to the Tribunal in such cases, the net profit rate has to be adopted and once the net profit is adopted it cannot be said that there is perversity of approach.
The Tribunal restricted the addition at 5% of the net profit on the gross receipt
and the appeal was partly allowed in favour of the assessee.
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…
Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…
Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…
ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee In a recent…