Income Tax

Expenditure can’t be disallowed only because not debited in Profit & Loss Account

Expenditure can’t be disallowed because it is not debited in Profit and Loss Account – ITAT 

In a recent judgment, ITAT Guwahati has held that only because of expenditure not debited in Profit and Loss it does not disentitle assessee to claim deduction of the said expenditure if assessee otherwise is eligible for the same. 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 4031 (2024) (05) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the disallowance of deduction towards expenditure on donation.

The assessee was an individual. He had made donation of Rs.2,00,000/- to a charitable

organization which was approved u/s 80G of the Act, therefore, in his income tax return the assessee had claimed the deduction of the said amount.

However, in the tax audit report of the assessee, the chartered accountant inadvertently noted the said amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- as personal expenses on account of donation.

Based on the audit report, in summary assessment u/s 143(1) of the Act, the deduction claimed by the assessee was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO).

Before the Tribunal, the assessee contended that there was a bona fide mistake on the part of the auditor to report the said donation as personal expenses. The assessee further submitted that this fact was brought to the notice of the CIT(A), however, the CIT(A) disallowed the said expenditure observing that the said expenditure was not debited to the Profit & Loss Account.

It was submitted that the assessee was an individual and only because of the said expenditure was not debited in the business account of its proprietorship business, that does not disentitle the assessee to claim the deduction of the said expenditure if the assessee otherwise is eligible for the same.

In view of the submissions of the assessee, the Tribunal opined that the lower authorities were not justified in making the impugned addition and the same was ordered to be deleted.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Prevention of Corruption Act

CBDT Instruction can not absolve persons to explain source of gold within limits specified – SC

Mere CBDT Instructions cannot absolve individuals of their obligation to explain the source and nature of their gold holdings, even…

2 days ago
  • ICSI

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026. Last date 16.11.2026

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026 ICSI has invited interested members to enroll as General Observers for…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT address some important issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA

ITAT answers some important and inter-related issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA In a recent judgment, ITAT has dealt with…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Mere carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return – ITAT

Carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return, it is only the set off in subsequent year…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

Sales duly recorded in books & VAT returns, can’t be held bogus without cogent adverse material

Where sales are duly recorded in books and VAT returns, to treat it bogus sales, AO must bringing cogent adverse…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT allows Diwali expenses incurred by assessee as business expenses

Expenses to celebrate Diwali with staff creates a goodwill and, therefore amounts to expenses incurred for the purpose of business…

2 weeks ago