Income Tax

Fund Managers remuneration provisions u/s 9A(3)(m) relaxed by CBDT for FY 2019-20 and 2020­-21

Fund Managers remuneration provisions u/s 9A(3)(m) relaxed by CBDT for FY 2019-20 and 2020­-21 if at arm’s length

Circular No. 1 of 2021

F. No. /370142/2/2021-TPL,
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
(Tax Policy and Legislation Division)
******

New De1hi, 15th January, 2021

Amount of remuneration prescribed under section 9A(3)(m) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Finance (No 2) Act, 2019inter alia, amended clause (m) of sub-section (3) of section 9A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) w.e.f. 01.04.2019 to provide for payment of remuneration by an eligible investment fund to an eligible fund manager in respect of fund management activity undertaken by him on its behalf to be not less than the amount calculated in such manner as may be prescribed.

2. Accordingly, rule 10V of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (the Rules) has been amended, w.e.f. 01.04.2019, vide Notification No 29/2020 dated 27.05.2020 by way of, inter cilia, insertion of sub-rules (12) and (13) therein. Sub-rule (12) provides for the amount of remuneration to be paid by the fund to a fund manager. 2nd proviso of the said sub-rule provides that the fund may seek Board’s approval in case where the amount of remuneration is lower than the amount so prescribed.

3. In this regard, representations have been received expressing inability to comply with the provisions of sub-rule 12 of rule 10V of the Rules regarding the amount of remuneration to be paid by the fund to a fund manager for the financial year 2019-20 as the said Notification No 29/2020 was notified after the financial year got over and the financial year 2020-21 had already

4. In order to avoid genuine hardship in such cases, the Board, in exercise of powers conferred under section 119 of the Act, has decided to provide that for the financial years 2019-20 and 2020­21 in cases where the remuneration paid to the fund manager is lower than the amount of remuneration prescribed under sub-rule (12) of rule 10V of the Rules, but is at arm’s length, it shall be sufficient compliance to clause (m) of sub-section (3) of section 9A of the Act.

5. It is stated that the remuneration to be paid to the fund manager, for the financial year 2021-­22, shall be in accordance with sub-rule (12) of rule 10V of the Rules and the application for lower remuneration in terms of 2nd proviso for this year, if any, may he filed not later than 1st February, 2021.

(Vipul Agarwal)

Director (Tax Policy and Division)

Download Circular Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

2 days ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

2 days ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

3 days ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

4 days ago