Income Tax

High Court refuses to quash prosecution u/s 276CC on the ground that non filing ITR was not wilful

High Court refuses to quash prosecution u/s 276CC for not filing return of income. Whether the failure was wilful or not to be considered by the trial court 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2428 (2018) 07 HC

The instant Petition was filed by the assessee against the prosecution u/s 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) filed by the Income Tax Department in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court.

The prayer was made to quash the proceedings mainly on the ground that the failure to file income tax return was not willful.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that admittedly, the petitioner had failed to file Income Tax Return. A notice was issued to him under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act to submit his return. In spite of receipt of the notice, he did not file it. This was the circumstance in which the prosecution was lodged against him.

It was also observed that the only specific ground was that the failure was not wilful which was a fact to be considered by the trial court on the basis of the evidence adduced before it. The Hon’ble High Court opined that such disputed question of fact cannot be decided by this court in a proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

The Petition was dismissed.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago