Income Tax

Issues already considered by CIT(A) cannot be again a subject matter of revision u/s 263

Issues already considered by CIT(A) in his order, cannot be again a subject matter of  revision by Pr CIT u/s 263

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3622 (2022) (12) ITAT

Important Case Laws relied upon:
Southern Motors vs State of Karnataka (2017) 3 SCC 467 (SC)

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the revisionary order passed by the Pr CIT u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) to push up the gross total turnover of the assessee, which had been determined by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the original assessment orders. 

The assessee contended that the estimated addition as made in the assessment order u/s 153 was the subject matter of appeal before the CIT(A), who had vide his order deleted the said addition and on further appeal by the Revenue, the Tribunal had dismissed the appeals of the revenue.

It was the contention that the very foundation on which the Pr. CIT had invoked his powers u/s 263 stood deleted.

The Tribunal observed that these issues have already been considered by the CIT(A) and by the Tribunal in their orders.

The Tribunal stated that once an issues have already been considered by the CIT(A), the same cannot be a subject matter of revision u/s 263 of the Act.

The Tribunal further stated that the very foundation on which the revision was being proposed by the Pr. CIT had already been adjudicated and deleted by the CIT(A) and such deletion had also been confirmed by the Tribunal. 

In view of the above, the Tribunal quashed the orders passed by Pr. CIT as unsustainable on facts.

Accordingly, the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Information in loose papers not corroborated with assessee, can’t be said to belong to assessee

When information contained in loose papers not corroborated with assessee, there is absolutely no room for presumption that it belongs…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Setting aside remand order of CIT(A) without interfering with direction to delete addition, did not revive AO’s order

When CIT(A) order to remand case to AO was set aside without interfering with direction to delete addition, order of…

1 day ago
  • arbitration

Whether Arbitral Tribunal can grant a prohibited claim in a contract – Larger Bench to decide

Whether a prohibited claim in a contract applies only to the employer and not to the Arbitral Tribunal – Matter…

2 days ago
  • contract-law

Court can examine contractual employee termination on sole ground of ineligibility

Where a contractual employee is terminated on the sole ground of ineligibility, the Court is entitled to examine its correctness…

2 days ago
  • EPFO

Upon deceased acquiring family, as specified earlier GPF nomination became invalid – SC

Upon deceased acquiring family, GPF nomination in favour of mother became invalid and in absence of fresh nomination, mother and…

2 days ago
  • GST

Auto Suspension of GST Registration due to Non-Furnishing of Bank Account Details

GSTN Advisory on Auto Suspension of GST Registration due to Non-Furnishing of Bank Account Details as per Rule 10A As…

2 days ago