Issues already considered by CIT(A) in his order, cannot be again a subject matter of revision by Pr CIT u/s 263
ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3622 (2022) (12) ITAT
Important Case Laws relied upon:
Southern Motors vs State of Karnataka (2017) 3 SCC 467 (SC)
In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the revisionary order passed by the Pr CIT u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) to push up the gross total turnover of the assessee, which had been determined by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the original assessment orders.
The assessee contended that the estimated addition as made in the assessment order u/s 153 was the subject matter of appeal before the CIT(A), who had vide his order deleted the said addition and on further appeal by the Revenue, the Tribunal had dismissed the appeals of the revenue.
It was the contention that the very foundation on which the Pr. CIT had invoked his powers u/s 263 stood deleted.
The Tribunal observed that these issues have already been considered by the CIT(A) and by the Tribunal in their orders.
The Tribunal stated that once an issues have already been considered by the CIT(A), the same cannot be a subject matter of revision u/s 263 of the Act.
The Tribunal further stated that the very foundation on which the revision was being proposed by the Pr. CIT had already been adjudicated and deleted by the CIT(A) and such deletion had also been confirmed by the Tribunal.
In view of the above, the Tribunal quashed the orders passed by Pr. CIT as unsustainable on facts.
Accordingly, the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
RBI specifies ‘Related Party’ with respect to bank RBI has issued RBI Credit Risk Management Directions, 2025 defining ‘Related Party’…
Advisory on Filing Opt-In Declaration for Specified Premises, 2025 Dear Taxpayers, The relevant declarations issued vide Notification No. 05/2025 –…
FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026 Q1. Who is required to get registered under the…
Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…
When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…
Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…