ITAT disallows 6% for alleged bogus purchases as purchases from unregistered dealers could not be ruled out.
In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that a disallowance of 6% for alleged bogus purchases was appropriate as purchases from unregistered dealers per se could not be altogether ruled out and corresponding sales had not been questioned.
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
5195 (2026) (08) abacus.in ITAT
Important Case Laws relied upon by Parties:
In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition under section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) towards alleged bogus purchases.
The Tribunal observed that the assessee was engaged in the business of wholesale trading of iron and steel all along wherein possibility of assessee sourcing its purchases from unregistered dealers per se could not be altogether ruled out as well. And that his corresponding sales had nowhere been questioned in both the lower proceedings.
The Tribunal also noted that various recent judicial precedents have decided the instant issue of bogus purchases with divergent views as well.
In view of the peculiar facts of the case, the Tribunal opined that it would be deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice that a lumpsum disallowance @ 6% of the assessee’s alleged bogus purchases would be just and proper with a rider that the same shall not be treated as a precedent. The assessee’s book entries were accordingly rejected to the very extent.
Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
Addition for cash deposits in bank account which were immediately transferred to other accounts deleted in absence any enquiry by…
CBDT Circular can’t restrict powers of Income Tax Authority u/s 119(2)(b) to condone delay beyond six years In a recent…
Benefit of the cash bought at the time of migration from Pakistan allowed as assessee fulfilled conditions of CBDT Circular…
Ambiguous notices without striking off the irrelevant limb cannot be the foundation of imposition of any penalty – Supreme Court…
Assessment itself is not a process to penalise assessee for earning undisclosed income – High Court upheld application of peak…
Actual use of asset not the sole test for allowability of depreciation and it may be allowed when business only…