Tribunal not justified in remanding the case when documents are available with it. It was the duty of the tribunal to consider the same – High Court
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2100 (2017) (10) HC
The High Court pronounced the common judgment while disposing off bunch of 49 appeals with common questions of law and Facts.
In the instant case, all the appellant assessee(s) were aggrieved by the order of the ITAT in remanding the matter back to the file of CIT(A) in view of the fact that remand was neither proposed on behalf of the assesse(s) or the Department. According to the appellant(s) the ITAT was not justified in remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) to verify the same facts which in fact already formed the basis of decision by CIT(A).
The High Court quashed and set aside the order of the Tribunal remanding back the matter to CIT-Appeals. The High Court opined that when documents were available in the tribunal, it was the duty of the tribunal to consider the same.
Sundry creditors outstanding in books can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) merely because recovery was barred by limitation - ITAT…
For claiming exemption u/s 11, assessee is required to furnish return of income within time allowed u/s 139 and not…
FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of Tax Collection at Source u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 Income Tax…
FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions under section 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025 by Budget 2026-27 Income…
Income Tax Department has issued a FAQ on amendments proposed to provisions related to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) and…
Baggage Rules 2026 to rationalise existing rules to address genuine concerns faced by passengers at airports The earlier Baggage Rules,…