Tribunal not justified in remanding the case when documents are available with it. It was the duty of the tribunal to consider the same – High Court
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2100 (2017) (10) HC
The High Court pronounced the common judgment while disposing off bunch of 49 appeals with common questions of law and Facts.
In the instant case, all the appellant assessee(s) were aggrieved by the order of the ITAT in remanding the matter back to the file of CIT(A) in view of the fact that remand was neither proposed on behalf of the assesse(s) or the Department. According to the appellant(s) the ITAT was not justified in remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) to verify the same facts which in fact already formed the basis of decision by CIT(A).
The High Court quashed and set aside the order of the Tribunal remanding back the matter to CIT-Appeals. The High Court opined that when documents were available in the tribunal, it was the duty of the tribunal to consider the same.
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…