Tribunal not justified in remanding the case when documents are available with it. It was the duty of the tribunal to consider the same – High Court
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2100 (2017) (10) HC
The High Court pronounced the common judgment while disposing off bunch of 49 appeals with common questions of law and Facts.
In the instant case, all the appellant assessee(s) were aggrieved by the order of the ITAT in remanding the matter back to the file of CIT(A) in view of the fact that remand was neither proposed on behalf of the assesse(s) or the Department. According to the appellant(s) the ITAT was not justified in remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) to verify the same facts which in fact already formed the basis of decision by CIT(A).
The High Court quashed and set aside the order of the Tribunal remanding back the matter to CIT-Appeals. The High Court opined that when documents were available in the tribunal, it was the duty of the tribunal to consider the same.
Frequently asked Questions on Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers Disclosure Scheme and Rule 2026. CBDT has released a FAQs on…
Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers- Disclosure Scheme Rules 2026 notified. Rule come into force on the 16th day of August,…
Order u/s 69 of the CGST Act authorising arrest of a person has to be communicated to him before arrest–…
Refund can not be denied on the ground that it was claimed in a return filed u/s 148 where no…
The distinction between religious and charitable purposes is determined by institution's primary or dominant object and not merely by presence…
For determination of what constitutes a fit case to issue notice u/s 148, rule of relevancy of the material and…