Tribunal not justified in remanding the case when documents are available with it. It was the duty of the tribunal to consider the same – High Court
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2100 (2017) (10) HC
The High Court pronounced the common judgment while disposing off bunch of 49 appeals with common questions of law and Facts.
In the instant case, all the appellant assessee(s) were aggrieved by the order of the ITAT in remanding the matter back to the file of CIT(A) in view of the fact that remand was neither proposed on behalf of the assesse(s) or the Department. According to the appellant(s) the ITAT was not justified in remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) to verify the same facts which in fact already formed the basis of decision by CIT(A).
The High Court quashed and set aside the order of the Tribunal remanding back the matter to CIT-Appeals. The High Court opined that when documents were available in the tribunal, it was the duty of the tribunal to consider the same.
----------- Similar Posts: -----------Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…
Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…
Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…
ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee In a recent…