Income Tax

ITAT slams appellant in filing multiple appeals as abuse of process of Court

ITAT slams appellant in filing multiple appeals as abuse of process of Court, against the principles of Res Judicata and principles of Constructive Res Judicata 

ABCAUS Neutral Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3683 (2023) (03) ITAT

Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:
Devilal Modi vs. Sales Tax Officer AIR 1965 SC 1150
Karnataka v. All India Manufacturers Organisation [2006] 4 SCC 683
Greenhalgh v. Mallard [1947] 2 All ER 255 (CA)
State of U.P. v. Nawab Hussain [1977] 2 SCC 806
Direct Recruit Class II Engg. Officers’ Assn.  v.  State of Maharashtra [1990] 2 SCC 715
K.K. Modi v. K.N. Modi [1998] 3 SCC 573

In the instant case, appeal was filed by the assessee against the impugned order of CIT(A).

The assessment of the assessee was completed by the Assessing Officer (AO) accepting the returned income. Against the said assessment, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A) which came to be dismissed by the impugned order. 

An appeal was filed before the ITAT against the order of  the  CIT(A). However, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. 

However, the appellant moved a rectification petition u/s 154 of the Act before the CIT(A) against the impugned order. The CIT(A) allowed the petition u/s 154, consequent to which the claim for deduction u/s 80IB(10) came to be allowed in favour of the assessee.

This order of the CIT(A) allowing the petition u/s 154 was again challenged before the Tribunal by the Department and was allowed in favour of the Revenue.

Surprisingly, the assessee again filed the instant appeal against the impugned order of the CIT(A) with the delay of more than 2000 days.

Looking at the case history, the Tribunal opined that such a litigative adventure by the appellant was clearly against the principles of Res Judicata as well as principles of Constructive Res Judicata and principles  analogous thereto.

The ITAT stated that the principles of Res Judicata are of universal application as it is based on two age old principles, namely, ‘interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium‘ which means that it is in the interest of the State that there should be an end to litigation and the other principle is ‘nemo debet his ve ari, si constetcuriae quod sit pro un aet eademn cause‘ meaning thereby that no one ought to be vexed twice in a litigation if it appears to the Court that it is for one and the same cause. 

The Tribunal observed that the principle of finality of litigation is based on high principle of public policy. In the absence of such a principle great oppression might result under the colour and pretence of law in as much as there will be no end of litigation and a rich and malicious litigant will succeed in infinitely vexing his opponent by repetitive suits and actions.  This may compel the weaker party to relinquish his right.  That is why it is perceived that the plea of Res Judicata is not a technical doctrine but a fundamental principle which sustains the Rule of Law in ensuring finality in litigation.  

The Tribunal went through a catena of jugments on the issue and observed that in view of authoritative pronouncement of the Constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court, there can be no doubt that the principles of Constructive Res Judicata as explained in the CPC, are also applicable to the appellant.

In the light of judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Tribunal opined that the adventure made by the appellant in filing the instant appeal, was nothing but abuse of process of Court.

As a result, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed. The assessee was lucky in that he was not subjected to a cost. 

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICSI

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations June 2026. Last date 28.04.2026

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations June 2026 ICSI has invited interested members to enroll as General Observers for…

1 day ago
  • CA CS CMA

Engagement of Young Professionals CA for assistance in ITAT representation

Income Tax Department Pune is engaging Young Professionals CA for assistance in ITAT representation With a view to augment departmental…

2 days ago
  • Concurrent Audit

IDBI online application for empanelment of Concurrent Auditor. Last date : 27.04.2026

IDBI invites application for empanelment of Chartered Accountant firms as Concurrent Auditor for FY 2026-27 IDBI Bank has invited online…

2 days ago
  • Bank

Audit reports must be disclosed by bank before classifying account of a customer as fraud

Audit reports must be disclosed if considered relevant by banks in classifying the account of a customer as fraud –…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

ICAI sets up a branch of CIRC at Korba city, Chhattisgarh w.e.f. 6th February, 2026

ICAI sets up a branch of CIRC at Korba city (Chhattisgarh) w.e.f. 6th February, 2026 Council of the Institute of…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Final Exams to be held twice a year from May 2026 Examination onwards – ICAI

Chartered Accountants Final Examination to be held twice a year from May 2026 Examination onwards ICAI vide Notification dated 15.04.2024…

3 days ago