Income Tax

Letting out buildings/developed space with other amenities in Industrial Park SEZ to be treated as business income-CBDT

Letting out  buildings/developed space with other amenities in Industrial Park SEZ to be treated as business income 

Circular N o. 16/2017

F.No. 279/Misc./140/2015/ITJ
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

New Delhi, 25th April, 2017

SUBJECT: Lease  rent  from  letting out  buildings/developed  space  along with  other amenities in an Industrial Park/SEZ– to be treated as business income.

The issue whether income arising from letting out of premises /developed space along with other amenities in an Industrial Park/SEZ is to be charged under head ‘Profits and Gains of Business’ or under the head ‘Income from House Property’ has been subject manner of litigation in recent  years. Assessees claim the letting out as business activity, the income arising from which to be charged to tax under the head ‘Profits and Gains of Business’ , whereas the Assessing Officers hold it to be chargeable under the head ‘Income from House Property’.

2. The matter has been considered by the Income from the Industrial Parks/ SEZ established under various schemes framed and notified under section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) is liable to be treated as income from business provided the conditions prescribed under the schemes are met.

In the case of Velankani Information Systems Pvt Ltd (NJRS Citation (2013-LL-0402-44), the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court observed that any other interpretation would defeat the object of section 80IA of the Act and government schemes for development of Industrial Parks in the country. SLPs filed in this case by the Department have been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

In a subsequent judgment  dated  30.04.2014 in ITA No 76 & 78/2012 in the case of CIT vs. Information Technology Park Ltd. (NJRS Citation (2014-LL-0430-141), the Karnataka  High Court has reaffirmed  its· earlier views. It has held that, since the assessee-company  was engaged in the business of developing,  operating  and  maintaining  an  Industrial Park and providing  infrastructure facilities to different companies as its business, the lease rent received by the assessee from letting out buildings along with other amenities in a software technology park would be chargeable to tax under the head “Income from Business” and not under the head “Income from House Property”. The judgement has been accepted by the Board.

In view of the above, it i s now a settled position that in the case of an undertaking which develops, develops and operates or maintains and operates an industrial park/SEZ notified in accordance with the scheme framed and notified by the Government, the income from letting out of premises/ developed space along with other facilities in an industrial park/SEZ is to be charged to tax under the head ‘Profits and Gains of Business’.

4. Accordingly, henceforth , appeals may not be filed by the Department on the  above settled issue and those already filed may be withdrawn/ not pressed upon.

5. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

(D.S. Chaudhry),
CIT (A&J), CBDT,
New Delhi

Download Circular Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

3 hours ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

1 day ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Case remanded in absence of finding if disallowance u/s 40A(3) covered by Rule 6DD

Case remanded as no finding was given whether cash payments disallowed u/s 40A(3) were covered by Rule 6DD under Income…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

For investment in share capital, source of investment is outside the control of the investee company

In case of investment in share capital, the source of investment may remain outside the control of the investee company.…

7 days ago