Income Tax

Letting out buildings/developed space with other amenities in Industrial Park SEZ to be treated as business income-CBDT

Letting out  buildings/developed space with other amenities in Industrial Park SEZ to be treated as business income 

Circular N o. 16/2017

F.No. 279/Misc./140/2015/ITJ
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

New Delhi, 25th April, 2017

SUBJECT: Lease  rent  from  letting out  buildings/developed  space  along with  other amenities in an Industrial Park/SEZ– to be treated as business income.

The issue whether income arising from letting out of premises /developed space along with other amenities in an Industrial Park/SEZ is to be charged under head ‘Profits and Gains of Business’ or under the head ‘Income from House Property’ has been subject manner of litigation in recent  years. Assessees claim the letting out as business activity, the income arising from which to be charged to tax under the head ‘Profits and Gains of Business’ , whereas the Assessing Officers hold it to be chargeable under the head ‘Income from House Property’.

2. The matter has been considered by the Income from the Industrial Parks/ SEZ established under various schemes framed and notified under section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) is liable to be treated as income from business provided the conditions prescribed under the schemes are met.

In the case of Velankani Information Systems Pvt Ltd (NJRS Citation (2013-LL-0402-44), the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court observed that any other interpretation would defeat the object of section 80IA of the Act and government schemes for development of Industrial Parks in the country. SLPs filed in this case by the Department have been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

In a subsequent judgment  dated  30.04.2014 in ITA No 76 & 78/2012 in the case of CIT vs. Information Technology Park Ltd. (NJRS Citation (2014-LL-0430-141), the Karnataka  High Court has reaffirmed  its· earlier views. It has held that, since the assessee-company  was engaged in the business of developing,  operating  and  maintaining  an  Industrial Park and providing  infrastructure facilities to different companies as its business, the lease rent received by the assessee from letting out buildings along with other amenities in a software technology park would be chargeable to tax under the head “Income from Business” and not under the head “Income from House Property”. The judgement has been accepted by the Board.

In view of the above, it i s now a settled position that in the case of an undertaking which develops, develops and operates or maintains and operates an industrial park/SEZ notified in accordance with the scheme framed and notified by the Government, the income from letting out of premises/ developed space along with other facilities in an industrial park/SEZ is to be charged to tax under the head ‘Profits and Gains of Business’.

4. Accordingly, henceforth , appeals may not be filed by the Department on the  above settled issue and those already filed may be withdrawn/ not pressed upon.

5. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

(D.S. Chaudhry),
CIT (A&J), CBDT,
New Delhi

Download Circular Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago