Income Tax

New Rule 12E-ITO authorsied to issue notice u/s 143(2) for scrutiny. Move to create enough manpower to scrutinise income tax returns post 30-12-2016

New Rule 12E-ITO authorsied to issue notice u/s 143(2) for scrutiny. Move to create enough manpower to scrutinise income tax returns post 30-12-2016

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 105 /2016

New Delhi, the 16th November, 2016

G.S.R. 1073(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 read with sub-section (2) of section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Income–tax (31st Amendment) Rules, 2016.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, after rule 12D, the following rule shall be inserted, namely:-

“12E. Prescribed authority under sub-section (2) of section 143.—The prescribed authority under sub-section (2) of section 143 shall be an income-tax authority not below the rank of an Income-tax Officer who has been authorised by the Central Board of Direct Taxes to act as income-tax authority for the purposes of sub-section (2) of section 143.”.

[F. No. 142/8/2014-TPL]
Dr. T. S. MAPWAL, Under Secy.

Also Read:
Can demonetised notes be considered as unexplained money u/s 69A Click Here >>
T
ax Implications of Demonetisation-Litigations to increase Click Here >>

 

Author’s Note:
Sub section (2) of Section 143 provides that where a return of income has been filed whether regularly u/s 139 or in response to a notice u/s 142, the Assessing Officer or the Prescribed Authority, may issue scrutiny notice to ensure that income has not been understated.

By authorising officers of the rank of Income Tax Officers (ITOs) as Prescribed Authorities, Income tax Department is preparing to create enough man powers to issue notices for carrying out scrutiny at large scale post 30th December, 2016

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago