No special drive to reopen cases to examine HRA claims – CBDT clarification on media reports claiming Income Tax Department special drive to reopen cases with reference to HRA claims
CBDT has clarified that apprehensions about retrospective taxation on incorrect HRA claims and re-opening of cases on issues pertaining to HRA claims is completely baseless.
According to the Press release issued by CBDT, there is Certain instances of mismatch of information as filed by the taxpayer and as available with the Income Tax Department have come to the notice of the Department as part of its routine exercise of verification of data. In such cases, the Department has alerted the taxpayers to enable them to take corrective action.
CBDT has observed that there are some posts on social media / news media, have highlighted enquiries initiated by the CBDT in cases where employees have made incorrect claims of HRA and rent paid.
However, CBDT has denied the apprehensions about retrospective taxation on these matters and re-opening of cases on issues pertaining to HRA claims is completely baseless.
CBDT has further stated that data analysis was carried out in some high-value cases of mismatch between the rent paid by the employee and receipt of rent by the recipient for the FY 2020-21. This verification was done in a small number of cases without re-opening bulk of cases, especially since Updated Return for FY 2020-21(AY 2021-22) could have been filed by the taxpayers concerned only till 31.03.2024.
It has been stated that the objective of the e-verification was to alert cases of mismatches of information for FY 2020-21 only without affecting the others.
CBDT has again reiterated that there is no special drive to re-open such cases, and media reports alleging that large-scale re-opening is being undertaken by the Department are completely misplaced.
ABCAUS Note: No surprise on CBDT clarification which has come at a time when Parliament election 2024 are on the anvil
PCIT cannot invoke the revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act upon a proposal from the Assessing Officer…
If AO intends to disturb income returned by assessee, it is mandatory on his part to issue notice under section…
Source of cash deposit being sales proceeds of household items upon sale of flat was held plausible and addition u/s…
TDS deductibility being debatable issue and not an apparent incorrect claim, CPC was not justified in making the disallowance In…
No addition when cash deposited in bank was out of cash in hand available with the assessee and AO could…
Use of word “can” in arbitration clause cannot be said to be a binding arbitration agreement –Supreme Court In a…