Income Tax

PAN Allotment Statistics Financial Year 2013-14 for Income Tax Department

Income Tax Department PAN Allotment Statistics Financial Year 2013-14

1. PAN Allotment- Taxpayer Status

Taxpayer Status

PAN Allotted During FY 2013-14

 Percentage
ASSOCIATION OF PERSONS 70,970 0.25%
BODY OF INDIVIDUALS 4,306 0.02%
COMPANY 1,01,973 0.36%
FIRM 2,43,789 0.86%
GOVERNMENT 876 0.00%
HUF 70,196 0.25%
ARTIFICIAL JURIDICAL PERSON 1,444 0.01%
LOCAL AUTHORITY 4,333 0.02%
INDIVIDUAL 2,76,45,257 98.07%
TRUST 46,308 0.16%
TOTAL 2,81,89,452 100.00%

Notes:

  1. “Taxpayer Status” means the status of the taxpayer as per PAN database of Income Tax Department.
  2. “Percentage” means percentage of number of PAN allotted for a given status with respect to total number of PAN allotted.

2. PAN Allotment – Gender and Age of Individual

 

Gender

  

Age bracket

 PAN Allotted During FY 2013-14 Percentage
Male =<18 years 9,20,833 3.33%
Male >18 and <= 20 years 22,80,875 8.25%
Male >20 and <= 30 years 70,41,241 25.47%
Male >30 and <= 40 years 35,74,978 12.93%
Male >40 and <= 50 years 23,41,942 8.47%
Male >50 and <= 60 years 12,62,814 4.57%
Male >60 and <= 70 years 6,04,535 2.19%
Male >70 and <= 80 years 2,41,194 0.87%
Male >=80years 44,956 0.16%
Total Male 183,13,368 66.24%
Female =<18 years 3,15,776 1.14%
Female >18 and <= 20 years 6,89,841 2.50%
Female >20 and <= 30 years 31,57,359 11.42%
Female >30 and <= 40 years 21,73,555 7.86%
Female >40 and <= 50 years 14,93,898 5.40%
Female >50 and <= 60 years 8,68,792 3.14%
Female >60 and <= 70 years 4,54,884 1.65%
Female >70 and <= 80 years 1,43,797 0.52%
Female >=80years 33,987 0.12%
Total Female 93,31,889 33.76%
Total 2,76,45,257 100.00%

Notes:

  1. “Individual” means the persons in the PAN database of Income Tax Department whose status is ‘Individual’ as per the PAN database.
  1. The age of the individual is taken as on 31st March 2013.
  1. “Percentage” means percentage of number of PAN allotted for a given Gender and Age Bracket with respect to total number of PAN allotted for Individual
Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago