Income Tax

PAN Allotment Statistics Financial Year 2013-14 for Income Tax Department

Income Tax Department PAN Allotment Statistics Financial Year 2013-14

1. PAN Allotment- Taxpayer Status

Taxpayer Status

PAN Allotted During FY 2013-14

 Percentage
ASSOCIATION OF PERSONS 70,970 0.25%
BODY OF INDIVIDUALS 4,306 0.02%
COMPANY 1,01,973 0.36%
FIRM 2,43,789 0.86%
GOVERNMENT 876 0.00%
HUF 70,196 0.25%
ARTIFICIAL JURIDICAL PERSON 1,444 0.01%
LOCAL AUTHORITY 4,333 0.02%
INDIVIDUAL 2,76,45,257 98.07%
TRUST 46,308 0.16%
TOTAL 2,81,89,452 100.00%

Notes:

  1. “Taxpayer Status” means the status of the taxpayer as per PAN database of Income Tax Department.
  2. “Percentage” means percentage of number of PAN allotted for a given status with respect to total number of PAN allotted.

2. PAN Allotment – Gender and Age of Individual

 

Gender

  

Age bracket

 PAN Allotted During FY 2013-14 Percentage
Male =<18 years 9,20,833 3.33%
Male >18 and <= 20 years 22,80,875 8.25%
Male >20 and <= 30 years 70,41,241 25.47%
Male >30 and <= 40 years 35,74,978 12.93%
Male >40 and <= 50 years 23,41,942 8.47%
Male >50 and <= 60 years 12,62,814 4.57%
Male >60 and <= 70 years 6,04,535 2.19%
Male >70 and <= 80 years 2,41,194 0.87%
Male >=80years 44,956 0.16%
Total Male 183,13,368 66.24%
Female =<18 years 3,15,776 1.14%
Female >18 and <= 20 years 6,89,841 2.50%
Female >20 and <= 30 years 31,57,359 11.42%
Female >30 and <= 40 years 21,73,555 7.86%
Female >40 and <= 50 years 14,93,898 5.40%
Female >50 and <= 60 years 8,68,792 3.14%
Female >60 and <= 70 years 4,54,884 1.65%
Female >70 and <= 80 years 1,43,797 0.52%
Female >=80years 33,987 0.12%
Total Female 93,31,889 33.76%
Total 2,76,45,257 100.00%

Notes:

  1. “Individual” means the persons in the PAN database of Income Tax Department whose status is ‘Individual’ as per the PAN database.
  1. The age of the individual is taken as on 31st March 2013.
  1. “Percentage” means percentage of number of PAN allotted for a given Gender and Age Bracket with respect to total number of PAN allotted for Individual
Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

6 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

7 days ago