Income Tax

Penalty SCN not striking off relevant limb upheld when later notices not challenged

Validity of Penalty notice non striking off relevant limb u/s 271(1)(c) upheld when subsequent opportunity notices sent by AO were not challenged

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2731 (2019) (01) ITAT

The assessee had filed the instant appeal against the order passed by the CIT(A) upholding the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

One of the ground taken by the assessee was that the CIT(A) ignored the fact that the AO initiated penalty u/s 271(1)(C) of the Act on account of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income whereas he had imposed penalty on account of concealment of income.

The assessee also filed an application for admission of the following additional grounds of appeal that the notice issued u/s 274 r.w.s. 271 was not specific that on which limb of section 271(1)(c) penalty was initiated.

The assessee contended that the AO had failed to delete the irrelevant default clause in the body of the ‘Show cause’ notice (‘SCN’), therefore, he had wrongly assumed jurisdiction and imposed penalty in the hands of the assessee.

In respect of his aforesaid contention, it was submitted that the default for which the assessee was put to notice and therein called upon explain as to why penalty under Sec. 271(1)(c) may not be imposed on him was not discernible from a perusal of the ‘SCN’.

However, the Tribunal observed that the AO, prior to imposing of penalty under Section 271(1)(c), subsequent to the said SCN, had also issued two opportunity notices. However, the assessee, on being confronted with the said fact, failed to assail the validity of the said notices.

The Tribunal opined that the validity of the jurisdiction assumed by the AO for imposing penalty u/s 271(1)(c) would also require a perusal of the said opportunity notices, the validity of which had not been assailed.

Accordingly, the additional grounds of appeal raised by the assessee was dismissed.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CPC order u/s 143(1) is appealable and hence no merger with order u/s 143(3) – ITAT

CPC order u/s 143(1) is appealable and hence the doctrine of merger with order u/s 143(3) do not arise -…

2 hours ago
  • GST

Under GST Act, there is no specific provision to disclose route of transportation of goods

Under GST Act, there is no specific provision which bounds selling dealer to disclose route to be taken during transportation…

5 hours ago
  • Companies Act

Restrictions on use of words “Nidhi Limited”-The Nidhi (Amendment) Rules, 2024

Restrictions on use of words Nidhi Limited unless declared as such under section 406(1). Nidhi (Amendment) Rules 2024 MINISTRY OF…

6 hours ago
  • Companies Act

MCA prescribes period & fee for updating directors personal mobile number & email

MCA prescribes period and fee for updating of Directors personal mobile number or email address by e-form DIR-3 KYC  MINISTRY…

6 hours ago
  • GST

GST e-invoice-1 and e-invoice-2 Portals to be launched from 18.07.2024

Integrated Services from NIC-IRP e-invoice-1 and e-invoice-2 Portals GSTN has informed that NIC is releasing the integrated services from e-invoice-1…

12 hours ago
  • Companies Act

The Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2024

The Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2024. MCA amends Form No. BEN-2 Return to the Registrar under section 90…

13 hours ago