Income Tax

Pre-dated demand notice even before assessment order was passed showed denial of natural justice

Pre-dating demand notice even before the assessment order was passed showed the assessee was denied any opportunity of hearing in violation of natural justice – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2799 (2019) (02) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had filed the appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in confirming the addition made for unexplained loans.

The assessee raised a legal ground that the notice of demand was pre-dated even before the assessment order was passed.

It was pointed out that the notice of demand issued by the Assessing Officer borne the date as 28.12.2012 whereas the assessment order was dated 31.12 .2012.

It was also submitted that the AO had sent the last notice dated 26.12.2012 fixing the date of hearing on 31.12.2012 suggesting that even before the date of hearing itself, the demand notice was prepared to give effect to the demand notice, the impugned order of assessment was passed without allowing any opportunity of hearing.

Thus, it was the case of the assessee that the impugned order was being passed in violation to the principles of natural justice and therefore the same was bad in law.

The Tribunal observed that the demand notice itself was issued on 28.12.2012, the hearing fixed on 31.12 .2012 became farce.

The Tribunal expressed agreement with the submission that proper opportunity of hearing was not allowed to the assessee and the impugned order was passed in violation o f principles of natural justice.

Accordingly, the ITAT set aside the assessment order and allowed appeal of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CBDT issues 23 FAQs on transition provisions under Section 536 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 

CBDT has issued 23 FAQs on transition provisions under Section 536 of the Income-tax Act, 2025  CBDT has issued 23…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Respondent assessee, under Rule 27 can’t raise a ground which is adverse to appellant Revenue

Respondent assesse, under Rule 27 not entitled to raise a ground which would work adversely to the appellant Revenue -…

2 days ago
  • huf

When testator was illiterate, burden was on propounder of Will to satisfy judicial conscience of Court

If judicial conscience of a final court of fact is not satisfied about the valid execution of the Will, it…

3 days ago
  • Insurance

Which ITRS are relevant for assessing income of deceased person under MV Act 1988

SC laid downs guidelines for use of ITRS for assessing annual income of deceased person under Motor Vehicles Act 1988…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT condones delay in filing Form No. 10AB

CBDT condones delay in filing Form No. 10AB furnished electronically between 01.10.2025 to 31.03.2026. CBDT has condoned the delay in…

6 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC express concern over AI generated judgments/paragraphs escaping scrutiny by NCLT/NCLAT

Supreme Court expresses serious concerns over AI generated judgments/paragraphs relied upon by the NCLT/NCLAT In a recent judgment, the Hon'ble…

7 days ago