Income Tax

Pre-dated demand notice even before assessment order was passed showed denial of natural justice

Pre-dating demand notice even before the assessment order was passed showed the assessee was denied any opportunity of hearing in violation of natural justice – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2799 (2019) (02) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had filed the appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in confirming the addition made for unexplained loans.

The assessee raised a legal ground that the notice of demand was pre-dated even before the assessment order was passed.

It was pointed out that the notice of demand issued by the Assessing Officer borne the date as 28.12.2012 whereas the assessment order was dated 31.12 .2012.

It was also submitted that the AO had sent the last notice dated 26.12.2012 fixing the date of hearing on 31.12.2012 suggesting that even before the date of hearing itself, the demand notice was prepared to give effect to the demand notice, the impugned order of assessment was passed without allowing any opportunity of hearing.

Thus, it was the case of the assessee that the impugned order was being passed in violation to the principles of natural justice and therefore the same was bad in law.

The Tribunal observed that the demand notice itself was issued on 28.12.2012, the hearing fixed on 31.12 .2012 became farce.

The Tribunal expressed agreement with the submission that proper opportunity of hearing was not allowed to the assessee and the impugned order was passed in violation o f principles of natural justice.

Accordingly, the ITAT set aside the assessment order and allowed appeal of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

4 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Unless medical certificate are held forged & fictitious, appeal can’t be rejected on ground of delay

Where medical certificate not held to be forged and fictitious, rejecting appeal on ground of delay unjustified In a recent…

9 hours ago
  • DGFT

One Star Export House status allowed based on export performance in two FYs

FTP 2023 amended to allow One Star Export House status to applicants (other than for Gems & Jewelry Sector) based…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Agricultural land is outside the deeming provision u/s 56(2)(x) – ITAT

Agricultural land is outside the definition of capital asset, therefore, the deeming provision u/s 56(2)(x) cannot be invoked - ITAT…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 1.2 for Tax Year 2026-27 – Download

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU version 1.2 for Tax Year 2026-27 NSDL has revised the e-TDS TCS RPU utility for…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Deprecation allowable u/s 11(6) if capital expenditure not claimed as application of income

Assessee entitled to claim deprecation u/s 11(6) if corresponding capital expenditure was not claimed as application of income - ITAT…

2 days ago