Income Tax

Pre-dated demand notice even before assessment order was passed showed denial of natural justice

Pre-dating demand notice even before the assessment order was passed showed the assessee was denied any opportunity of hearing in violation of natural justice – ITAT

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2799 (2019) (02) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had filed the appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in confirming the addition made for unexplained loans.

The assessee raised a legal ground that the notice of demand was pre-dated even before the assessment order was passed.

It was pointed out that the notice of demand issued by the Assessing Officer borne the date as 28.12.2012 whereas the assessment order was dated 31.12 .2012.

It was also submitted that the AO had sent the last notice dated 26.12.2012 fixing the date of hearing on 31.12.2012 suggesting that even before the date of hearing itself, the demand notice was prepared to give effect to the demand notice, the impugned order of assessment was passed without allowing any opportunity of hearing.

Thus, it was the case of the assessee that the impugned order was being passed in violation to the principles of natural justice and therefore the same was bad in law.

The Tribunal observed that the demand notice itself was issued on 28.12.2012, the hearing fixed on 31.12 .2012 became farce.

The Tribunal expressed agreement with the submission that proper opportunity of hearing was not allowed to the assessee and the impugned order was passed in violation o f principles of natural justice.

Accordingly, the ITAT set aside the assessment order and allowed appeal of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC

Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…

3 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Return of export cargo from Hormuz Strait where vessel do not lands at original port

CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…

3 days ago