Income Tax

Registration u/s 12A granted without applying tests laid down by Apex Court set aside

High Court order upholding direction for Registration u/s 12A without applying determinative tests laid down by Apex Court set aside

In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Supreme Court set aside the judgment of Allahabad High Court in granting registration u/s 12A without applying determinative tests laid down by Apex Court as to when an Institution can be said to serve a charitable purpose.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
4797 (2025) (10) abcaus.in SC

In the instant case, two connected cases arising out of separate order(s) of Allahabad High Court whereby appeal(s) of the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) against order(s) qua registration of the respondent assessee regarding its charitable purpose to enable benefit(s) available under the Act were dismissed by holding that the issues raised in the appeal(s) were squarely covered by earlier decision(s) of the High Court.

Before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Revenue submitted that now the law in respect of determinative tests to be adopted to determine the issue concerned has been settled by a three-Judge Bench decision of the Apex Court which has been further clarified in a subsequent judgment of the Supreme Court.

It was submitted that High court while passing the impugned order(s) had not considered and examined the facts of the case to ascertain whether the law propounded applied to those facts.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that though both sides agreed that the law has now been settled by the aforesaid decision however they differed on its impact on the instant appeals claiming that the decision supports their cause.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that the law laid down by its Full Bench deals with several issues including as to when an authority can be said to serve a charitable purpose whereas the impugned orders(s) were cryptic without elaborating the admitted factual situation. Therefore, the law cannot be applied in the abstract.

Therefore, the Hon’ble Supreme Court opined that the High Court would have to reconsider the appeal of the Revenue by taking into consideration the said decision of the Full Bench.

Consequently, the Hon’ble Supreme Court set aside the impugned order(s) and restored the Income Tax Appeals on the file of the High Court for a fresh consideration in accordance with law including the law laid down by their Lordships.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • consumer-protection

Compensation to borrower upheld as bank did not verify construction progress before loan disbursals to builder

Bank was liable to pay compensation to borrower as it did not verify the progress of construction before loan disbursals…

23 hours ago
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward arrest order & material in possession to Adjudicating Authority

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward the arrest order and the material in possession to the Adjudicating Authority. It…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized assets if mandatory on completion of 120 days? Question referred to Larger Bench

Whether the release of seized assets is mandatory upon completion of 120 days –High Court refers the case to a…

2 days ago
  • Uncategorized

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31/10/2026

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31st October 2026 Taking into account…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Earlier acceptance is relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation of fictitious investment

Earlier acceptance of investment is a relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation that investments were fictitious from inception – High…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

A bald statement recorded during survey can not be basis for any addition

A bald statement recorded during survey would not in itself be a foundation for any addition - ITAT In a…

5 days ago