Framing of rules with respect of Fund Manager Regime under section 9A of the Income-tax Act, 1961-Draft notification for inputs from stakeholders and the general public
F No 142/15/2015-TPL
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
******
New Delhi, 5th December, 2019
Section 9A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) provides for a special taxation regime in respect of certain offshore funds in context of their fund managers being located in India. It is provided that in case of an eligible investment fund, the fund management activity carried out through an eligible fund manager acting on behalf of such fund shall not constitute business connection in India of the said fund. Further, it is provided that an eligible investment fund shall not be said to be resident in India merely because the eligible fund manager undertaking fund management activities on its behalf is located in India subject to the conditions mentioned in sub section (3) of section 9A, one of which [clause (m) of said sub-section] provides that the remuneration paid by the fund to an eligible fund manager in respect of fund management activity undertaken by him on its behalf is not less than the arm’s length price of the said activity.
2. Accordingly, Income-tax Rules, 1962 (the Rules) was amended by way of insertion of rules 10V to 10VB and Forms 3CEJ and 3CEK vide notification No 14/2016 with SO 1101 (E) dated 15.03.2016. Rule 10V was further amended vide notification No 106/2016 with SO 3498(E) dated 21.11.2016.
3. Sub-rule (5) to (10) of rule 10V of the Rules contains the provisions relating to determination of the arm’s length price in respect of any remuneration paid by the eligible investment fund to an eligible fund manager as referred to in clause (m) of sub-section (5) of section 9A.
4. Finance (No 2) Act, 2019 with effect from 1st April, 2019, inter alia, amended clause (m) of sub-section (5) of section 9A so as to provide that the remuneration paid by the fund to an eligible fund manager in respect of fund management activity undertaken by him on its behalf is not less than the amount calculated in such manner as may be prescribed.
5. Accordingly, the manner for calculation of the amount to which remuneration paid to the eligible fund manager should not be less is required to be prescribed.
6. A draft notification to amend the Rules for this purpose is It is requested from the general public and the stakeholders to provide inputs electronically at the email address ustp11@nic.in. latest by 19th December, 2019
Encl: As above
(Neha Sahay)
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (OSD) (TPL)-I
Tel No: 011-2309 5468
E-mail: ustpll @nic.in
ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…
PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…
Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…
When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…
Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…
CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…