Income Tax

Salary earned for services rendered abroad by non resident not taxable in India

Salary earned for services rendered abroad by non resident not taxable in India treating it as accrued or arisen in India only because it was received in India

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2962 (2019) (05) ITAT

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:
Utanka Roy vs. DIT

The assessee’s only grievance raised in the instant appeal was the action of both the lower authorities’ in treating his salary income derived in lieu of services rendered in USA to be taxable in India u/s 5(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

The Tribunal observed that there was no dispute between the parties about the assessee having derived the impugned salary income by rendering services in United States of America. His paper book on record duly supported the same comprising of statement of facts, details of impugned salary, the employer, its said salary income having been subjected to social security tax, Medicare tax, scrutiny proceedings etc.,

The Tribunal noted that the Revenue’s sole argument was that the assessee had received the impugned income in India and therefore, the same had rightly been assessed in India under the provision of the Act.

The Tribunal opined that there was no merit in Revenue’s instant argument as the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court’s decision held that salary income derived from services rendered abroad cannot be held to have been accrued or arisen in India so as to exigible to assessment under the provision of the Act.

The Tribunal noted that their lordship had held that the question whether the petitioner had rendered services in India or not was a question of fact. When it was not disputed that the petitioner as a marine engineer had rendered services outside India for the period of 286 days, received his remuneration for such work from a foreign company, the Hon’ble High Court held that consequently, the income received by the petitioner for services rendered outside India had to be considered as income received out of India and treated as such.

Adopting the detailed reasoning of the Hon’ble High Court the Tribunal deleted the impugned addition

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Sundry creditors can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) because recovery barred by limitation

Sundry creditors outstanding in books can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) merely because recovery was barred by limitation - ITAT…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 11 allowed for ITR filed u/s 139 not u/s 139(1) as per CBDT Circular

For claiming exemption u/s 11, assessee is required to furnish return of income within time allowed u/s 139 and not…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of TCS u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of Tax Collection at Source u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025  Income Tax…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions u/s 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions under section 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025 by Budget 2026-27 Income…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on Amendments proposed in TDS and related provisions by Budget 2026-27

Income Tax Department has issued a FAQ on amendments proposed to provisions related to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) and…

12 hours ago
  • Custom

Baggage Rules 2026 rationalised, other newly introduced Custom reforms

Baggage Rules 2026 to rationalise existing rules to address genuine concerns faced by passengers at airports The earlier Baggage Rules,…

23 hours ago