Income Tax

SoP for issue of notice for substantial cash deposit during demonetisation period by CBDT

SoP for issue of notice for substantial cash deposit during demonetisation period. CBDT issues procedure for issue of notice u/s 142(1) of Income-tax Act

F.No. 225/363/2017-ITA.II
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue (CBDT)

North Block, N.Delhi, dated the 15th November, 2017

To
All Principal Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax/All Principal Directors-General of Income-tax

Sir/Madam,

Subject: SoP for issue of notice u/s 142(1) of Income-tax Act in cases related to substantial cash deposit during the demonetisation period-regd.-

On the basis of data analytics and information gathered during the first phase of online verification under ‘Operation Clean Money’, a list of assessees who had deposited substantial Cash in bank account(s) during the demonetisation period (8th November, 2016 to 30th December, 2016) but have not yet filed Income-tax return for Assessment Year 2017-2018 till date has been generated for further follow up action by the Income-tax Department.

(2) The list of such Non-Filers of income-tax returns is being made available in a phased manner to the jurisdictional income-tax authorities in AIMS module of ITBA under “Notice u/s 142(1) forAY 201718″.

(3) These cases would be handled as per the following Standard Operating Procedure (‘SoP’):

(i) While Government PANs (using 4th character) have not been flagged in the list, it is possible that a particular PAN might pertain to an entity which is not obliged to file the return (e.g. CSD Canteens, Army Hospitals ). Such cases should be marked as “No Return Required” by using the functionality provided in AIMS module of ITBA by the concerned Assessing Officer.

(ii) Thereafter, in remaining cases under “Notice u/s 142(1) forAY 201718″, the jurisdictional Assessing Officer shall issue notice u/s 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) to the concerned assessees for filing return of income for Assessment Year 2017-2018.

(iii) To facilitate service of notice, information regarding addresses in PAN database and earlier ITRs is availabe in ITBA portal

(iv) The notice should be generated through the ITBA System only.

(v) Notice u/s 142(1) shall be issued electronically as well as through postal The evidence of service of notice as well as postal remarks (in case of return of notice) should be preserved carefully. Where notice could not be served either electronically or through the postal authorities, then, personal service through departmental ITIs/Notice-servers should be made.

(vi) In cases where difficulties are faced in service of 142(1) notice, ITIs may make local enquiries to trace the concerned assessee and serve the notice upon him. As a final alternative, as far as abcaus.in possible,notice by affixation with due procedure should also be In all cases of affixture, information should be captured in the system by selecting the appropriate option in ITBA. However, where notice could not be served even by by affixture because of fictitious/non-existent address, this information should also be captured in the system against the appropriate option available in ITBA.

4. All information regarding date(s) of service of notice u/s 142(1) upon the addressee has to be captured using the functionality provided in ITBA for this purpose. The process of service of notice under section 142(1) should be completed by 31st December, 2017.

(Ankita Pandey)
Under Secretary-ITA.II, CBDT

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Assessee developing infrastructure facility of Govt. not contractor for denying 80IA deduction

Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional PCIT/CIT to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s 12A

Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in making addition by adopting extrapolation without any material evidence

AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers decided by CoC

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When quantum appeal restored, penalty can’t be levied for non-payment of demand

When quantum appeal stands restored to the AO, penalty can not be levied u/s 221(1) of the Income Tax Act…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Even in case of bogus purchases, entire purchases cannot be disallowed – ITAT

Even if, the assessee is engaged in the bogus purchases, the entire purchases cannot be disallowed - ITAT In a…

4 days ago