Income Tax

Supreme Court to decide if non mentioning DIN by income tax authorities makes order void

Supreme Court to decide if non mentioning DIN by income tax authorities makes order void or it’s just a procedural mistake

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3855 (2024) (02) SC

CBDT Circular No.19/2019 dated 14th August 2019 provides that on or after the 15th day of October, 2019, no communication shall be issued by any income­ tax authority relating to assessment, appeals, orders, statutory or otherwise, exemptions, enquiry, investigation, verification of information, penalty, prosecution, rectification, approval etc . to the assessee or any other person, unless a computer-generated Document Identification Number (DIN) has been allotted and is duly quoted in the body of such communication. Though exceptions were provided in the case of technical difficulties or other circumstances as provided.

The purpose of the above direction was to maintain proper audit trail of all communications.

Resorting to the above Circular, in a number of cases, the assessees have challenged the assessment order/notices issued by the Income Tax Department.

Based on the directions of the Circular, the various ITATs have ruled in favour of the assessee on further appeal, High Courts too have ruled that not mentioning the DIN number in order of the AO, the order will lose its validity and makes it Income Tax order without DIN void ab initio. The appeal of the Revenue have been dismissed by the High Courts in such cases holding that no substantial question of law arises for consideration.

Supreme Court stays Delhi High Court order

In particular, the Delhi High Court by a detailed order held that any communication which is not in conformity with the 2019 Circular is to be treated as invalid, as if it was never issued. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court rejected the contention of the Revenue that failure to generate and allocate DIN in this case is a mistake or at best, a defect and/or an omission, which ought not to invalidate the assessment proceedings.

However, the Revenue challenged that order of the Delhi High Court before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Recently, the Apex Court has stayed the order of the Delhi High Court and ITAT which held non mentioning of DIN makes order void.

Now, the question of validity of income tax order/notices without DIN rests with the Hon’ble Supreme Court and shall be decided in due course. Tentative next listing of the case is in February 2024.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

GST Form SRM-I enabled for manufacturers of Pan Masala and Tobacco

GST Form SRM-I enabled for manufacturers of Pan Masala and Tobacco. Form GST SRM-II will also be made available on…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Prosecution for late deposit of TDS stayed in view of Supreme Court judgment

Prosecution for late deposit of TDS stayed by High Court in view of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court In…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

If no physical discrepancy found, mere increase in stock not undisclosed stock u/s 69B

Unless, discrepancy is found in physical quantities, assessee agreeing to increase stock value does not amount to undisclosed stock u/s…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT(A) is required to communicate the notice to email id mentioned in Appeal Form 35

CIT(A) is required to communicate the notice through the email id available in Form 35 of the  appeal memo as…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Opportunity of personal hearing u/s 144B(6)(viii) must even if assessee had not requested

Section 144B(6)(viii) cannot be read to mean that opportunity of personal hearing may be granted only where the assessee specifically…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

New functionality in AIS to display status of information confirmation process in real-time

CBDT releases new functionality in AIS for taxpayers to display status of information confirmation process in real-time. Taxpayers can now…

3 days ago