CBDT notifies tolerance range in transfer pricing for variation between ALM u/s 92C for AY 2024-25
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
Notification No. 116/2024
New Delhi, the 18th October, 2024
INCOME-TAX
S.O. 4571(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub-section (2) of section 92C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)(hereafter referred to as the said Act) read with the proviso to sub-rule (7) of rule 10CA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Central Government hereby notifies that where the variation between the arm’s length price determined under section 92C of the said Act and the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken does not exceed (i) one per cent. of the latter in respect of wholesale trading; and (ii) three per cent. of the latter in all other cases — the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken shall be deemed to be the arm’s length price for the assessment year 2024-2025.
Explanation.- For the purposes of this notification, “wholesale trading” means an international transaction or specified domestic transaction of trading in goods, which fulfils the following conditions, namely:-
a. purchase cost of finished goods is eighty per cent. or more of the total cost pertaining to such trading activities; and
b. average monthly closing inventory of such goods is ten per cent. or less of sales pertaining to such trading activities
[F. No. 500/1/2014-APA-II]
KARTHIK CHEBOLI,
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD)(APA-I) FT&TR -I, CBDT
Explanatory Memorandum
The notification provides for tolerance range of one per cent. for wholesale trading and three per cent. in all other cases for the assessment year 2024-2025. It is certified that none will be adversely affected by the retrospective effect being given to the notification.
Download CBDT Notification 116/2024 Click Here >>
Over 30 approvals u/s 153D granted within minutes amounted to total non-application of mind – Bombay High Court In a…
When AO invoked provisions of section 37(1) to disallow purchases, provisions of section 69C of the Act are not applicable…
ITAT refuses to accept opening cash as source of cash deposit as assessee was not subject to audit and cash…
Mere preparation of income tax notice and forwarding the same for dispatch is not effective issuance of notice until it…
Agreement validly terminated prior to initiation of CIRP did not constitute “assets” or “property” of the corporate debtor u/s 14…
Supreme Court explains jurisdiction of courts under NI Act for dishonour of account payee or bearer cheques In a recent…