Trust set up for providing benefits to a particular community no ground to deny Section 12AA registration
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3295 (2020) (04) ITAT
Important case law relied upon by the parties:
Leuva Patel Seva Samaj Trust
M/s Ananda Social & Educational Trust
In this case, the appellant assessee had filed the appeal before the ITAT against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) denying registration in proceedings u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act).
The assessee was a Trust who had applied to CIT(E) for registration u/s 12AA of the Act for getting its income exempt from income tax. However, The CIT (Exemption) declined the application for registration by his twin folded reasoning that the trust had been set up to provide benefits to only a particular community and therefore its activities could not be said to be genuine.
The Tribunal however did not find any merit in the findings of the CIT(E).
The Tribunal found that in a similar case, the Commissioner had declined Section 12AA Registration being prohibited under section 13(1)(b) of the Act. However the Hon’ble High Court had upheld the decision of the Tribunal reversing the order of the CIT(E). The Hon’ble High Court had held that the question of a trust set up for providing benefits to a particular community is not a ground to deny section 12AA registration since the issue arises during the course of exemption proceedings u/s 11 only.
The Hon’ble High Court had stated that while considering an application for registration of a trust, the Commissioner must also make a clear distinction between the requirement of registration and the requirement for claiming tax benefit. The latter question falls squarely to be considered by the Assessing Office.
Further, in the instant case, the Tribunal further observed that on the aspect of non-genuine activities, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had held that only an assessee’s objects have be examined at the time of granting Section 12AA registration and not the activities
Accordingly, the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled for the impugned Section 12AA registration and allowed the assessee’s appeal.
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…