When the income determined as taxable is below exemption limit, provisions of section 115BBE can not be invoked.
In a recent case, ITAT Lucknow deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) by invoking provisions of section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) merely because assessee had not filed return of income as his income was below the taxable limit.
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
4827 (2025) (11) abcaus.in ITAT
This is an example how power to assess can be abused to harass an assessee and how appellate departmental machinery functions in a mechanical manner favouring revenue.
In the instant case, the assessment order was passed u/s 147 read with section 144/144B of the Act whereby the assessee’s total income was determined at an amount which was less than 2,50,000/- which was below the basic exemption limit for the relevant Assessment Year. However, the AO while framing the reassessment made an addition under section 69A of the Act on account of cash deposited by the assessee in bank and invoked the higher rate of taxation u/s 115BBE of the Act.
Against the assessment order, the assessee’s appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A).
The Tribunal observed that both the Assessing Officer as well as CIT(A) were in agreement that assessee’s total income was below the taxable limit for the relevant assessment year.
The Tribunal further noted that both the lower authorities had taken an adverse view of the fact that the assessee did not file return of income and therefore invoked the provisions of section 115BBE of the Act to bring the exempt income of the assessee to tax.
The Tribunal opined that when the assessee’s total income is below the taxable limit, there is no requirement on the part of the assessee, under law, to file return of income. When there is no requirement under law to file return of income, no adverse view can be taken against the assessee for not filing return of income. Therefore, the action of the Assessing Officer in invoking the provisions of section 115BBE of the Act, which was confirmed by the CIT(A) in the impugned appellate order, was unsustainable.
Therefore, the Tribunal quashed the assessment order and the impugned appellate order was set aside.
Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…