Withholding tax non residents-Disallowance us 40(a)(i) to be on income component only. CBDT Circular 3/2015 to be followed in litigation before ITAT/Courts
F.No.500/39/2015 (US FT & TR-V)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Foreign Tax & Tax Research –II
FT & TR-V Division
New Delhi, 26th of October, 2016.
To
All the Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax / Pr Director General of Income Tax
Sir Madam,
Sub: Withholding of tax on “Other sum chargeable” in the case of non residents –Disallowance Ws 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act 1961 – reg.
Reference is invited to Circular No 3/2015 dated 12.2.2015 issued by the CBDT clarifying that for the purpose of making disallowance of “other sums chargeable” under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in the case of non-residents, the appropriate portion of the sum chargeable to tax under the Act, i.e. income component therein shall form the basis of such disallowance.
2. It has been brought to the notice of the Board by various forums, that this Circular is not being kept in view by administrative Commissioners & Commissioners (Appeal) while filing further appeals and while deciding cases. Further, the Circular is not kept in view by departmental representatives in ongoing litigation cases, who still take a position that the disallowance should be based on the gross amount of offshore payments such as purchases. In this connection, I am directed to request you that the departmental officers including representatives of the department in litigation before ITAT/Courts etc. may be sensitized to the content of this circular.
3. This issues with the approval of Member (IT), CBDT.
(Tatung Padi)
DCIT(OSD), FT&TR-V, CBDT
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…
Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…
CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…
Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…