In exercise of the powers conferred by section 247 read with sections 458, 459 and 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government, vide Gazette Notification dated 18th October, 2017, published the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, 2017 (hereafter ‘Rules’).
Rule 11 of the Rules provides for transitional arrangement that any person, who may be rendering valuation services under the Companies Act, 2013 on the date of commencement of the Rules, may continue to render valuation services without a certificate of registration under the Rules up to 31st March, 2018. Further, the Rules clarify that conduct of valuation by any person under any law other than the Companies Act, 2013 or the Rules shall not be affected by virtue of coming into effect of the Rules unless the relevant other laws or other regulatory bodies require valuation by such person in accordance with the Rules.
However, vide Gazette Notification dated 9th February, 2018, the timeline of 31st March, 2018 has been extended to 30th September, 2018. In other words, a person who may be rendering valuation services under the Companies Act, 2013 on the date of commencement of the Rules, may continue to render valuation services without a certificate of registration under the Rules up to 30th September, 2018.
In the meantime, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has made available valuation examinations for all three asset classes. A person eligible for registration as a registered valuer may submit the application for registration in accordance with the Rules.
In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…
Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…
SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…
Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…
Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…
Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…