Government established ten new offices of Regional Directors MCA under LLP Act 2008/Companies Act 2013
The Central Government, in exercise of the powers under section 68A of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 and section 396 of the Companies Act 2013 has established Regional Directors offices to discharge the functions conferred upon them by the said Act or delegated to them by the Central Government under LLP / Companies Act for the respective jurisdiction.
| Sl No. | Office and Locations | Jurisdiction |
| (1) | (2) | (3) |
| 1. | Regional Director, Northern Region Directorate I, Headquarter at New Delhi | State of Uttar Pradesh and National Capital Territory of Delhi |
| 2. | Regional Director, Northern Region Directorate II, Headquarter at Chandigarh | States of Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand and Union Territories of Chandigarh, Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir |
| 3. | Regional Director, North-Western Region Directorate, Headquarter at Ahmedabad | States of Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli. |
| 4. | Regional Director, Western Region Directorate I, Headquarter at Mumbai | State of Goa, Union Territory of Daman and Diu and the Districts of Mumbai and Mumbai Suburban |
| 5. | Regional Director, Western Region Directorate II, Headquarter at Navi Mumbai. | All districts of Maharashtra other than Mumbai and Mumbai Suburban |
| 6. | Regional Director, Southern Region Directorate, Headquarter at Chennai | State of Tamil Nadu, Union Territory of Puducherry and Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands |
| 7. | Regional Director, South-Western Region Directorate, Headquarter at Bangalore | States of Karnataka, Kerala and Union Territory of Lakshadweep |
| 8. | Regional Director, Eastern Region Directorate, Headquarter at Kolkata | States of West Bengal, Bihar and Jharkhand |
| 9. | Regional Director, Northeastern Region Directorate, Headquarter at Guwahati. | States of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura |
| 10. | Regional Director, Southeastern Region Directorate, Headquarter at Hyderabad |
States of Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Odisha and Telangana |
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…