NEPC

UPI per transactions limit increased to Rs. 5 lakhs for tax payments

National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) has increased the UPI per transaction limit to Rs. 5 lakhs for tax payments with effect from 15th September 2024

UPI per transactions limit has been increased to Rs. 5 lakhs for tax payments. Earlier, in 2021. NPCI w.e.f. 14th December 2021 has increased the said limit of UPI transactions to Rs. 5 lakhs for Retail Direct Schemes and UPI based ASBA IPO.

In view of the circular dated 24.08.2024, the per transaction value limit in UPI has now been enhanced to 5 lakhs for entities under categories aligned to tax payments. This enhanced limit shall only be applicable to ‘Verified Merchants’, in the applicable category.

It has been directed that to Implement the said increased limit:

1. Banks/PSPs/UPI Apps shall ensure that per transaction limit has been enhanced for the categories of verified merchants.

2. Acquiring entities must ensure that the classification of their merchants within ‘MCC- 9311’ strictly adheres to the tax payments only. They shall ensure that entities are added to the ‘Verified Merchant’ list after proper due diligence.

3. Merchants shall ensure UPI as a payment mode is enabled for the increased limit for the tax payments category.

The updated chart of the UPI per transaction limits for specified categories are as under:

CategoryIdentifierCircular Reference/Remark
Tax PaymentsMCC-9311New w.e.f. 15.09.2024
Hospital & Educational ServicesMCC- 8011, 8021, 8031, 8041, 8042,8049,8050, 8062, 8071, 8099,0742,8211,8220,8241, 8244,8249,8299Existing
IPO & G Sec through RBI Retail Direct Scheme (RDS)MCC 6211 Purpose Code- 01 (IPO), 25 (RDS)Existing

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CBDT issues 23 FAQs on transition provisions under Section 536 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 

CBDT has issued 23 FAQs on transition provisions under Section 536 of the Income-tax Act, 2025  CBDT has issued 23…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Respondent assessee, under Rule 27 can’t raise a ground which is adverse to appellant Revenue

Respondent assesse, under Rule 27 not entitled to raise a ground which would work adversely to the appellant Revenue -…

1 day ago
  • huf

When testator was illiterate, burden was on propounder of Will to satisfy judicial conscience of Court

If judicial conscience of a final court of fact is not satisfied about the valid execution of the Will, it…

2 days ago
  • Insurance

Which ITRS are relevant for assessing income of deceased person under MV Act 1988

SC laid downs guidelines for use of ITRS for assessing annual income of deceased person under Motor Vehicles Act 1988…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT condones delay in filing Form No. 10AB

CBDT condones delay in filing Form No. 10AB furnished electronically between 01.10.2025 to 31.03.2026. CBDT has condoned the delay in…

6 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC express concern over AI generated judgments/paragraphs escaping scrutiny by NCLT/NCLAT

Supreme Court expresses serious concerns over AI generated judgments/paragraphs relied upon by the NCLT/NCLAT In a recent judgment, the Hon'ble…

6 days ago