Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

13 reporting entities notified for Aadhaar authentication for PMLA purpose

13 reporting entities notified to perform authentication under the Aadhaar Act for the purposes of section 11A of the Money- laundering Act.

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 13th August, 2024

S.O. 3454(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11A of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003) (hereinafter referred to as the Money-laundering Act), the Central Government on being satisfied that the reporting entities mentioned in the Table below comply with the standards of privacy and security under the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 (18 of 2016)(hereinafter referred to as the Aadhaar Act), and it is necessary and expedient to do so, and after consultation with the Unique Identification Authority of India established under sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Aadhaar Act and the appropriate regulator namely, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, hereby permits the said reporting entities to perform authentication under the Aadhaar Act for the purposes of section 11A of the Money- laundering Act, namely:

TABLE

Sl No. (1)  Reporting Entities (2)

1 RKSV Securities India Private Limited.

2 OPG Securities Private Limited.

3 SBICAP Securities Limited.

4 SMC Global Securities Limited.

5 JM Financial Services Limited.

6 Arihant Capital Market Limited.

7 Moneylicious Securities Private Limited.

8 SMIFS Limited.

9 ACML Capital Markets Limited.

10 Aditya Birla Money Limited.

11 Monarch Networth Capital Limited.

12 Comfort Securities Limited.

13 R.K. Stock Holding Private Limited.

14 Angel One Limited. And

15 IIFL Securities Limited

[F. No. P-12011/3/2022-ES Cell-DOR (Part-1)]

RIMJHIM PANDEY, Under Secy.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago