13 reporting entities notified to perform authentication under the Aadhaar Act for the purposes of section 11A of the Money- laundering Act.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 13th August, 2024
S.O. 3454(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11A of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003) (hereinafter referred to as the Money-laundering Act), the Central Government on being satisfied that the reporting entities mentioned in the Table below comply with the standards of privacy and security under the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 (18 of 2016)(hereinafter referred to as the Aadhaar Act), and it is necessary and expedient to do so, and after consultation with the Unique Identification Authority of India established under sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Aadhaar Act and the appropriate regulator namely, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, hereby permits the said reporting entities to perform authentication under the Aadhaar Act for the purposes of section 11A of the Money- laundering Act, namely:
TABLE
Sl No. (1)Â Reporting Entities (2)
1 RKSV Securities India Private Limited.
2 OPG Securities Private Limited.
3 SBICAP Securities Limited.
4 SMC Global Securities Limited.
5 JM Financial Services Limited.
6 Arihant Capital Market Limited.
7 Moneylicious Securities Private Limited.
8 SMIFS Limited.
9 ACML Capital Markets Limited.
10 Aditya Birla Money Limited.
11 Monarch Networth Capital Limited.
12 Comfort Securities Limited.
13 R.K. Stock Holding Private Limited.
14 Angel One Limited. And
15 IIFL Securities Limited
[F. No. P-12011/3/2022-ES Cell-DOR (Part-1)]
RIMJHIM PANDEY, Under Secy.
Download Notification Click Here >>
- Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices
- SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor
- Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus
- ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years
- Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC
