RBI

PMJDY accounts cash withdrawal limit-Rs. 10000/- per month for fully KYC complaint account and Rs. 5000/- for Limited or Non KYC compliant account-RBI

PMJDY accounts cash withdrawal limit-Rs. 10000/- per month for fully KYC complaint account and Rs. 5000/- for Limited or Non KYC compliant account-RBI 

Reserve Bank of India

Accounts under PMJDY – Precautions

RBI/2016-17/165
DCM (Plg) No. 1450/10.27.00/2016-17

November 29, 2016

The Chairman / Managing Director/ Chief Executive Officer,
Public Sector Banks/ Private Sector Banks / Foreign Banks/ Regional Rural
Banks / Urban Cooperative Banks/ State Cooperative Banks/ District Central Cooperative Banks

Dear Sir,

Accounts under PMJDY – Precautions

Please refer to our circular DCM (Plg) No.1424/10.27.00/2016-16 dated November 25, 2016 on “Withdrawal of cash – Weekly limit”. With a view to protect the innocent farmers and rural account holders of PMJDY from activities of money launders and legal consequences under the Benami Property Transaction & Money Laundering laws, it has been decided to place certain limits, as a matter of precaution, on the operations in the PMJDY accounts funded through deposits of Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) after November 09, 2016. As a temporary measure, the banks are advised to observe the following in respect of the PMJDY accounts:

  1. Fully KYC complaint account holders may be allowed to withdraw ₹ 10,000/- from their account, in a month. The branch managers may allow further withdrawals beyond ₹ 10,000 within the current applicable limits only after ascertaining the genuineness of such withdrawals and duly documenting the same on bank’s record.
  2. Limited or Non KYC compliant account holders may be allowed to withdraw ₹ 5,000 per month from the amount deposited through SBNs after November 09, 2016 within the overall ceiling of ₹ 10,000.

Yours faithfully,

(P Vijaya Kumar)
Chief General Manager

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Reassessment on basis of borrowed belief of Anti-Corruption Bureau quashed

ITAT quashed reassessment on the basis of borrowed belief of Anti-Corruption Bureau without applying mind In a recent judgment, ITAT…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

In considering disallowance u/s 40A(2) genuineness of expenditure not relevant issue

In considering disallowance u/s 40A(2) for payments to specified persons, genuineness of expenditure is not a relevant issue. In a…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Expression “Yes I am satisfied” in approval u/s 151 not a vital defect – ITAT

Expression “Yes I am satisfied” in approval u/s 151 not such a vital defect on the basis of which, re-opening…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Section 143(1) Intimation not an order for Revision u/s 264 of Income Tax Act

Section 143(1) Intimation is only an intimation and it cannot be treated as an order for the purpose of Section…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT with jurisdiction over non corporate assesee can’t transfer corporate assessee’s case

Order u/s 127 quashed as PCIT having jurisdiction over non corporate assesee could not have transferred case of a corporate…

16 hours ago
  • DGFT

Modalities for issue of export authorizations of wheat flour & related products

DGFT issues modalities for eligibility, receipt and processing of applications for issuance of authorizations for export of wheat flour and…

20 hours ago