RTI

Judicial proceedings and records thereof are public records for RTI purpose – CIC

Judicial proceedings and records thereof are public records for RTI purpose even if the person not a party to the judicial proceedings under reference – CIC

The Appellant had filed a complaint against the Management of a Church before the Metropolitan Magistrate Court. The appellant subsequently filed a RTI application, seeking Copy of notice/summon, response /reply submitted to the Magistrate by the responding management and incidental information thereto relating to judicial proceedings The PIO denied the information. The First Appellate Authority (FAA) did not adjudicate in the matter. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant had approached the Central Information Commission.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

No statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act – HC

There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand  …

34 mins ago
  • ICSI

Engagement of Company Secretaries as Young Professionals at RoC Mumbai and Pune

Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Applicability of Section 115BBE rws 69, 69A 69C in a case before Settlement Commission

Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE  read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

3 days ago