SEBI

Only ‘1600’ phone number series for service & calls by SEBI registered entities

All SEBI regulated/registered entities to only use ‘1600’ phone number series exclusively for service and transactional voice calls to their existing customers

New ‘1600’ Phone number series to Combat Fraud and Enhance Investor Protection in the securities market

In an effort to enhance investor protection and curb financial fraud, SEBI has advised its regulated/registered entities to comply with the latest guidelines by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). Specifically, all regulated/registered entities are advised to only use the ‘1600’ phone number series exclusively for service and transactional voice calls to their existing customers.

Investors  should  note  the  new ’1600’ phone numbering series to easily identify and attend  service  and  transactional  calls  from  SEBI  regulated/registered entities,  thereby enhancing  investor  security  and  minimising  the  risk  of  fraud  by  unscrupulous  entities using regular 10 digit numbers.

Any Unsolicited Commercial Communications (UCC) or suspected fraudulent activities can be reported by investors as under:

(i) In case of receiving spam or UCC, make a Do Not Disturb (DND) complaint through your telecom service provider’s app or website (e.g., Airtel, Jio, Vi, MTNL, BSNL etc.), use the TRAI DND app, or call/SMS 1909.

(ii) In case of receiving suspected fraud communication, report to Chakshu Platform of Department of Telecommunications (https://sancharsaathi.gov.in/sfc/).

(iii) In  case  fraud  has  already  happened,  report  the  same  to  Cyber  Crime helpline number 1930 or website www.cybercrime.gov.in.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

6 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

7 days ago