SEBI

SEBI cautions public regarding dealing in ‘Digital Gold’ or ‘E-Gold’

SEBI Has issued a Press Release cautioning on dealing in Digital Gold.

Digital Gold or E-Gold refers to electronic investment products that allow investors to buy, sell, and hold gold digitally without physically possessing it. Such Digital Gold is claimed to backed by real, physical gold stored securely in vaults by trusted custodians. In India, there are several entities offering Digital Gold / E-Gold products i.e. (i) MMTC‑PAMP India Pvt. Ltd. a joint venture between MMTC Ltd. (a government undertaking) and Swiss firm PAMP SA, (ii) Digital Gold India Pvt. Ltd. (brand: SafeGold), (iii) Augmont Goldtech Pvt. Ltd., (iv) Jewellery brands: e.g., Tanishq’s “Gold+” digital gold plan via SafeGold etc.

SEBI has stated that it has come to its notice that some digital/online platforms are offering investors to invest in ‘Digital Gold/E-Gold Products’. Digital Gold is being marketed as an alternative for investment in physical gold.

SEBI has clarified that it had enabled investments in gold and gold related instruments through various SEBI regulated gold products. These are exchange traded commodity derivative contracts, Gold Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) offered by Mutual Funds and Electronic Gold Receipts (EGRs) tradeable on stock exchanges. Investments in these SEBI regulated gold products can be made through SEBI registered intermediaries and are governed by the regulatory framework prescribed by SEBI.

SEBI has informed that said digital gold products are different from SEBI regulated gold products as they are neither notified as securities nor regulated as commodity derivatives. They operate entirely outside the purview of SEBI.

SEBI has stated that such digital gold products may entail significant risks for investors and may expose investors to counterparty and operational risks and none of the investor protection mechanisms under securities market purview shall be available for investments in such Digital Gold/ E-Gold products.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Once loans is repaid in subsequent years, addition u/s 68 cannot be made

Once loans were repaid in subsequent assessment years with cogent evidences then the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax…

21 hours ago
  • Government

Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar & Ajeevika Mission-Gramin “VB-GRAM-G” notified

Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar & Ajeevika Mission (Gramin), In short VB-GRAM-G notified Government has notified Viksit Bharat Guarantee for…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

In denovo assessment , AO to apply independent mind without influenced by remarks

Once PCIT restores assessment to AO for denovo consideration, AO is obliged to independently apply mind without influenced by the…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Stock items of different value cannot be taken as basis for computing stock position

When value of items traded differs it cannot be taken as basis for computing the stock position specially when quantitative…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

Revision of the area of jurisdiction of the DRATs, Kolkata

Revision of the area of jurisdiction of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunals (DRATs) Kolkata In exercise of the powers conferred…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non-compete fee held as allowable revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of IT Act – Supreme Court

Payment made by the assessee as non-compete fee was an allowable revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Act –Supreme…

3 days ago