SEBI

SEBI issues guidelines for safer participation of retail investors in Algorithmic trading

SEBI issues guidelines for safer participation of retail investors in Algorithmic trading.

Safer participation of retail investors in Algorithmic trading. Any order that is generated using automated execution logic is known as Algorithmic Trading. Generally, the features of algorithmic trading (‘algo  trading’) include  using  a  defined  set  of instructions in the form of algos to generate trading signals and placing orders.  

In an effort to enhance market efficiency and transparency, SEBI had introduced Algorithmic Trading through Direct Market Access (DMA) Facility, which provided significant advantages such as faster order execution, reduced transaction costs, greater transparency, better audit trails and improved liquidity. 

SEBI has issued the following regulatory framework to facilitate safer participation of retail investors in Algorithmic trading through brokers which includes use of Application Programming Interface (API), roles and responsibilities of Stock Brokers/Exchanges, empanelment and Registration of Algo Providers etc.

As per Framework, two categorization of Algos have been prescribed. First, Algos where logic is disclosed and replicable i.e. Execution Algos or White box Algos and second Algos where the logic is not known to the user and is not replicable, i.e. Black box Algos. For Black Box Algos, the algo provider shall register  as  a  Research  Analyst  and  maintain  a detailed research  report  for  each  such algo and  confirm  to  the exchanges that such report has been maintained. In case of any change in the logic governing the algo, register such algo as a fresh algo and maintain a detailed research.

Exchanges shall continue to be responsible for supervising algorithmic trading and putting in place a comprehensive Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for testing of algos.

Download SEBI Circular on Algorithmic Trading Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

7 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago