SEBI issues guidelines for safer participation of retail investors in Algorithmic trading

SEBI issues guidelines for safer participation of retail investors in Algorithmic trading.

Safer participation of retail investors in Algorithmic trading. Any order that is generated using automated execution logic is known as Algorithmic Trading. Generally, the features of algorithmic trading (‘algo  trading’) include  using  a  defined  set  of instructions in the form of algos to generate trading signals and placing orders.  

In an effort to enhance market efficiency and transparency, SEBI had introduced Algorithmic Trading through Direct Market Access (DMA) Facility, which provided significant advantages such as faster order execution, reduced transaction costs, greater transparency, better audit trails and improved liquidity. 

SEBI has issued the following regulatory framework to facilitate safer participation of retail investors in Algorithmic trading through brokers which includes use of Application Programming Interface (API), roles and responsibilities of Stock Brokers/Exchanges, empanelment and Registration of Algo Providers etc.

As per Framework, two categorization of Algos have been prescribed. First, Algos where logic is disclosed and replicable i.e. Execution Algos or White box Algos and second Algos where the logic is not known to the user and is not replicable, i.e. Black box Algos. For Black Box Algos, the algo provider shall register  as  a  Research  Analyst  and  maintain  a detailed research  report  for  each  such algo and  confirm  to  the exchanges that such report has been maintained. In case of any change in the logic governing the algo, register such algo as a fresh algo and maintain a detailed research.

Exchanges shall continue to be responsible for supervising algorithmic trading and putting in place a comprehensive Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for testing of algos.

Download SEBI Circular on Algorithmic Trading Click Here >>

• Sale of flats in a real estate project held capital gains considering intention of assessee
• Interest liability recognised by journal entries at the close of year, can’t be termed as fictitious – ITAT
• Cash deposits in bank which were immediately transferred to other accounts – addition deleted
• ITAT disallows 6% for alleged bogus purchases being appropriate
• CBDT can’t restrict power of CIT u/s 119(2)(b) to condone delay beyond six years – High Court