SEBI

SEBI revises its regulation on additional incentives to Mutual Fund distributors

SEBI revises its regulation on additional incentives to Mutual Fund distributors for onboarding new individual investors from B-30 cities and women investors

Regulation 52(6A)(b) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations 1996 provide a framework for incentivizing distributors for new investment/inflows from beyond top 30 cities (B-30 cities). However, due to concerns of misuse of this framework, based on the feedback received from the industry, SEBI has decided to revise the incentive structure for distributors for bringing in new investment/ inflows in the Mutual Funds.

Accordingly, by notification dated October 31, 2025, the said Regulation 52(6A)(b) had been deleted. However, in order to encourage mutual fund distributors to expand their outreach and create awareness among new investors, in terms of Regulation 52(4A) of SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 the mutual fund distributors shall be eligible for additional commission in the following manner –

1.The following new investments/inflows shall be eligible for the additional commission:

(a) New individual investors (new PAN) from B-30 cities, at the mutual fund industry level. (b) New women individual investors (new PAN) from both Top 30 and B-30 cities.

2.Incentive Structure: AMCs shall pay additional commission to distributors for onboarding eligible new investors, subject to the conditions specified above.

3.The structure of such additional commission shall be as under:

Investment Mode Commission Structure
Lump Sum Investment 1% of the amount of the first application subject to a maximum of ₹2,000, provided the investor remains invested for a minimum period of one year
Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) 1% of the total investment made during the first year, subject to a maximum of ₹2,000

The additional distribution commission shall be paid from the 2 basis points on daily net assets, mandated to be set apart annually by AMCs for investor education, awareness and financial inclusion initiatives, subject to adequate claw back provisions.

The additional commission shall be in addition to the existing trail commission paid to the distributor from the scheme.

Distributors shall be eligible to receive the additional commission for mobilizing investments from new women investors from Top-30 cities and in cases where the commission for new investment from B-30 cities has not been claimed for the   same woman investor/investment.  Dual incentives for the same investor/investment shall not be permitted.

4. Investment in scheme not eligible for additional commission:

Payment of additional distribution commission in the manner specified shall be mandatory for all schemes of a mutual fund, except Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs);  Fund of Funds (domestic) with more than 80% of Assets Under Management (AUM) invested in domestic funds; Schemes having duration requirement of less than one year: (a) Overnight Fund; (b) Liquid Fund; (c) Ultra Short Duration Fund; and (d) Low Duration Fund.

In order to ensure uniform implementation, AMFI in consultation with SEBI, shall issue the necessary implementation standards within 30 calendar days.

Further, any change in the offer document, pursuant to the revised incentive structure shall not be considered as a Fundamental Attribute Change.

The provisions of this circular shall come into effect from February 01, 2026.

Download SEBI Circular Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

15 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago