SEZ Unit-Developer service tax refund
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
NOTIFICATION No. 30/2016-Service Tax
New Delhi, the 26th May, 2016
G.S.R. —(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), read with sub-section (5) of section 161 of the Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 12/2013-Service Tax, dated the 1st July, 2013, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 448(E), dated the 1st July, 2013, namely:-
In the said notification, in paragraph 3, in sub-paragraph (III),-
(i) for clause (b), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:-
“(b) the of-
(i) the service tax paid on the specified services on which ab-initio exemption is admissible but not claimed, and
(ii) the amount distributed to it in terms of clause (a).”;
(ii) in clause (ba),
(a) in item (i), after the words “Swachh Bharat Cess”, the words “and Krishi Kalyan Cess” shall be inserted;
(b) in item (ii) for the words “by effective rate of Swachh Bharat Cess”, the words “by sum of effective rates of Swachh Bharat Cess and Krishi Kalyan Cess” shall be substituted.
This notification shall come into force from the 1 st day of June, 2016.
[F.No. B-1/18/2016 – TRU]
(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary
Note:-The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) by notification No. 12/2013-Service Tax, dated the 1st July, 2013, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 448(E), dated the 1st July, 2013 and last amended vide notification No. 02/2016-Service Tax, dated the 3 rd February, 2016 vide number G.S.R. 140(E), dated the 3 rd February, 2016.
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…