SEZ Unit-Developer service tax refund
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
NOTIFICATION No. 30/2016-Service Tax
New Delhi, the 26th May, 2016
G.S.R. —(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), read with sub-section (5) of section 161 of the Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 12/2013-Service Tax, dated the 1st July, 2013, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 448(E), dated the 1st July, 2013, namely:-
In the said notification, in paragraph 3, in sub-paragraph (III),-
(i) for clause (b), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:-
“(b) the of-
(i) the service tax paid on the specified services on which ab-initio exemption is admissible but not claimed, and
(ii) the amount distributed to it in terms of clause (a).”;
(ii) in clause (ba),
(a) in item (i), after the words “Swachh Bharat Cess”, the words “and Krishi Kalyan Cess” shall be inserted;
(b) in item (ii) for the words “by effective rate of Swachh Bharat Cess”, the words “by sum of effective rates of Swachh Bharat Cess and Krishi Kalyan Cess” shall be substituted.
This notification shall come into force from the 1 st day of June, 2016.
[F.No. B-1/18/2016 – TRU]
(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary
Note:-The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) by notification No. 12/2013-Service Tax, dated the 1st July, 2013, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 448(E), dated the 1st July, 2013 and last amended vide notification No. 02/2016-Service Tax, dated the 3 rd February, 2016 vide number G.S.R. 140(E), dated the 3 rd February, 2016.
Supreme Court stays DGGI order on the issue of bar on two parallel GST proceedings in terms of Section 6(2)(b)…
Assessee could not said to indulged in penny stock sale on human probabilities without showing his involvement – ITAT deleted…
Before staying CESTAT order the High Court should have framed the substantial questions of law and thereafter could have passed…
Chartered Accountant issuing Form 15CB not required check genuineness or otherwise of documents submitted by his clients – Supreme Court…
Ongoing investigation qua absconding person, cannot be a ground to deny bail to person against whom the investigations have been…
Accommodation entry operators also routinely obtain PAN, file ITRs, and maintain bank accounts, to give a facade of legitimacy to…