SEZ Unit-Developer service tax refund
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
NOTIFICATION No. 30/2016-Service Tax
New Delhi, the 26th May, 2016
G.S.R. —(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), read with sub-section (5) of section 161 of the Finance Act, 2016 (28 of 2016), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 12/2013-Service Tax, dated the 1st July, 2013, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 448(E), dated the 1st July, 2013, namely:-
In the said notification, in paragraph 3, in sub-paragraph (III),-
(i) for clause (b), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:-
“(b) the of-
(i) the service tax paid on the specified services on which ab-initio exemption is admissible but not claimed, and
(ii) the amount distributed to it in terms of clause (a).”;
(ii) in clause (ba),
(a) in item (i), after the words “Swachh Bharat Cess”, the words “and Krishi Kalyan Cess” shall be inserted;
(b) in item (ii) for the words “by effective rate of Swachh Bharat Cess”, the words “by sum of effective rates of Swachh Bharat Cess and Krishi Kalyan Cess” shall be substituted.
This notification shall come into force from the 1 st day of June, 2016.
[F.No. B-1/18/2016 – TRU]
(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary
Note:-The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) by notification No. 12/2013-Service Tax, dated the 1st July, 2013, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 448(E), dated the 1st July, 2013 and last amended vide notification No. 02/2016-Service Tax, dated the 3 rd February, 2016 vide number G.S.R. 140(E), dated the 3 rd February, 2016.
AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…
FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied. The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…
Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…