Companies Act

Board meetings through video conferencing/ other audio visual means extension till 30.06.2021

MCA extends time for holding Board meetings through video conferencing/ other audio visual means till 30.06.2021

Board meetings through video conferencing Extension

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

Notification

New Delhi , the 30th December, 2020

G.S.R. ………… (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sections 173, 177, 178 and section 186 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014,  namely:-

1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Meetings  of  Board and its Powers) Fourth Amendment  Rules, 2020.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, in rule 4, in sub-rule (2), for the figures, letters and word “31st December, 2020”, the figures, letters and word “30th June, 2021” shall be substituted.

[F. No . 1/32/2013-CL-V-Part]

(Manoj Pandey)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India

Note : The principal rules were published in the  Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II , Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide notification number G.S.R. 240(E), dated the 31st March, 2014 and subsequently amended as follows:-

  1. G.S.R. 398 (E) , dated the 12th June, 2014 ;
  2. G.S. 590 (E), dated the 14th August, 2014; 
  3. S.R. 206 (E), dated the 18th March, 2015; 
  4. S.R. 971(E), dated the 14th December, 2015;
  5. G.S. 309 (E), dated the 30th March , 2017;
  6. G.R. 880 (E), dated the 13th July, 2017;
  7. S.R. 429 (E), dated the 7th May, 2018;
  8. S.R. 777 (E), dated the 11th October, 2019;
  9. G.R. 857 (E), dated the 18th November , 2019;
  10. S.R. 186 (E) , dated the 19th March, 2020;
  11. S.R. 395 (E), dated the 23rd June, 2020 ; and
  12. S.R. 590 (E), dated the 28th September, 2020

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non issue of notice u/s 143(2) for even belated ITR filed u/s 148 makes assessment void ab initio

Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Calculation of functional disability depends on victim’s earning capacity in open market – SC

Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Appeal against ITAT shall lie only before High Court within whose jurisdiction AO is situated

Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…

6 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 weeks ago