ICAI

ICAI removes name of two CAs from member’s register having been found guilty of misconduct

ICAI removes name of two CAs from member’s register having been found guilty of misconduct and confirmed by Allahabad High Court

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA
(Set up under an Act of Parliament)

New Delhi, the 17 November, 2017

NOTIFICATION
(CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS)

No.29-CA/Law/D-338/2017.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 20 of The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Regulation 18 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988, it is hereby notified by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India that the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad has, in pursuance of Section 21(6)(c) of the said Act, in Referred Case No. 1/2014, ordered on 2nd August, 2017 that the name of Shri Satish Kumar Gupta, Chartered Accountant, 1, Navyug Market, 2nd Floor, Ghaziabad- 201001 (M.No. 070260) be removed from the Register of Members for a period of three months for having been found guilty of “Other Misconduct” falling under Section 22 read with Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Accordingly, it is hereby notified that the name of the said Shri Satish Kumar Gupta shall stand removed from the Register of Members for a period of three months from 01.12.2017 to 28.02.2018. During the aforesaid period he shall not practise as a Chartered Accountant in terms of the said order of the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad.

SAGAR, Secy.
[ADVT.-III/4/Exty./320/17]

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA

(Set up under an Act of Parliament)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 20th November, 2017

(CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS)

No.29-CA/LAW/D-69, 82/2017.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section (2) of Section 20 of The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Regulation 18 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988, it is hereby notified by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India that the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad has, in pursuance to Section 21(6)(c) of the said Act, in Chartered Accountant Reference Nos. 1 of 1999 ordered on 25th April, 2017 that the name of Shri D.K. Agarwal, 46-A, Madhav Kunj, Pratap Nagar, Agra- 282010 (M.No.016535) be removed from the register of members for a period of five years for having been found guilty of “Other Misconduct” falling under Section 22 read with Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. It is further notified by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India that the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad has in another case, in pursuance to Section 21(6)(c) of the said Act, in Chartered Accountant Reference Nos. 2 of 1999 ordered on 28th September, 2017 that the name of Shri D.K. Agarwal, 46-A, Madhav Kunj, Pratap Nagar, Agra- 282010 (M.No.016535) be removed from the register of members permanently for having been found guilty of “Other Misconduct” falling under Section 22 read with Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. In view of the above, it is notified that the name of Shri D. K. Agarwal shall stand removed permanently from the register of members from the date of publication of this notification.

V. SAGAR, Secy.
[ADVT-III/4/Exty./319/173]

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Assessee developing infrastructure facility of Govt. not contractor for denying 80IA deduction

Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional PCIT/CIT to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s 12A

Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in making addition by adopting extrapolation without any material evidence

AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers decided by CoC

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When quantum appeal restored, penalty can’t be levied for non-payment of demand

When quantum appeal stands restored to the AO, penalty can not be levied u/s 221(1) of the Income Tax Act…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Even in case of bogus purchases, entire purchases cannot be disallowed – ITAT

Even if, the assessee is engaged in the bogus purchases, the entire purchases cannot be disallowed - ITAT In a…

5 days ago