Income Tax

Age of Chairperson ViceChairperson Members of Tribunal Appellate Tribunal other Authorities – Amendment

Age of Chairperson ViceChairperson Members of Tribunal Appellate Tribunal other Authorities – Amendment to section 184 of Finance Act 2017

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 29th May, 2017

S.O. 1702(E).–Whereas, the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) received the assent of the President on 31st March, 2017;

And whereas, second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 184 of the said Act provides that the age of the Chairperson, Chairman or President shall not exceed seventy years and the age of the Vice- Chairperson, ViceChairman, Vice- President, Presiding Officer or any other Member shall not exceed sixty- seven years;

And whereas, such provision of the said Act had come into force on the 26th day of May, 2017;
And whereas, no person is qualified to be appointed as the Presiding Officer-

(a) of the Securities Appellate Tribunal established under the Securities Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), unless he is, or has been, a judge of Supreme Court or Chief Justice of High Court or a Judge of High Court for at least seven years;

(b) of the Industrial Tribunal constituted by the Central Government under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) unless he is, has been, or is qualified to be, a Judge of High Court; and

(c) of the Debts Recovery Tribunal established under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (51 of 1993) unless he is a Judge of District Court;

And whereas, a difficulty has arisen in giving effect to the aforesaid provisions of the said Act as a Judge of the Supreme Court or the Chief Justice of a High Court or a Judge of a High Court, after appointment as the Presiding Officer of Securities Appellate Tribunal may not be retired at the age of Sixty-five and his age of retirement be increase to the Seventy years as in case of the Chairperson or Chairman or President of Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, or as the case may be, Authority;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 189 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following Order, namely: –

1. Short title and commencement.—(1) This Order may be called the Finance (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2017.
(2) It shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017), in section 184, in sub-section (1), in the second proviso, –

(i) in clause (a), for the words “or President”, the words “President or the Presiding Officer of the Securities Appellate Tribunal” shall be substituted;

(ii) in clause (b), after the words “Presiding Officer”, the words “of the Industrial Tribunal constituted by the Central Government and the Debts Recovery Tribunal” shall be inserted.

[F. No. A.50050/9/2016-Ad1C (CESTAT) Pt. I]
UDAI SINGH KUMAWAT, Jt. Secy.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • ICSI

Engagement of Company Secretaries as Young Professionals at RoC Mumbai and Pune

Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…

20 mins ago
  • Income Tax

Applicability of Section 115BBE rws 69, 69A 69C in a case before Settlement Commission

Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE  read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

3 days ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

3 days ago