Income Tax

Amendment to India-France Double Taxation Avoidance Convention

Government of India and France sign the Amending Protocol to amend the India-France Double Taxation Avoidance Convention

CBT has stated that during the recent visit of the President of France to India, the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the French Republic have signed a Protocol amending the India- France Double Taxation Avoidance Convention, signed on 29 September 1992 (‘India-France DTAC’).

According to the Press Release issued in this regard, the Amending Protocol provides full taxing rights in respect of capital gains arising from sale of shares of a company, to the jurisdiction where such company is a resident. The Amending Protocol also deletes the so-called Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) Clause from the Protocol to the DTAC, thereby bringing to rest all issues relating to it. The Amending Protocol also modifies the taxation of income from dividends by replacing a single rate of 10% of tax with a split rate of 5% for those holding at least ten percent of capital and 15% of tax for all other cases. It also modifies the definition of ‘Fees for Technical Services’ by aligning it with the definition in India US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and expands the scope of ‘Permanent Establishment’ by adding Service PE.

It is further stated that the Amending Protocol also updates the provisions on Exchange of Information and introduces a new Article on Assistance in Collection of Taxes, as per international standards. This would enable and facilitate seamless exchange of information and strengthen mutual tax cooperation between India and France. The Amending Protocol also incorporates within the DTAC, the applicable provisions of BEPS Multilateral Instrument (MLI), that had already become applicable consequent to the signing and ratification of MLI by India and France.

However, the changes shall enter into effect subsequent to the completion of internal procedures under the laws of both the countries and subject to the terms agreed between the two countries. 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In case of admitted income, AO not required to establish evidentiary basis thereof – HC

In case of admitted income, it is not for the Assessing Officer to establish the evidentiary basis thereof – High…

43 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

If cash sales accepted, section 68/69A can’t be invoked for receipt of SBNs after demonetisation

Once cash sales are accepted, section 68/69A cannot be invoked merely for violation of RBI guidelines for receipt of SBNs…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Payment on behalf of shareholder, debited to his deposit account not deemed dividend

Payment made on behalf of the shareholder and debited to his deposit account having credit balance not deemed dividend u/s…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Assesssing Officer can’t refer decision to initiate levy of Penalty to Superior Officer

Assesssing Officer can’t refer decision to initiate levy of Penalty u/s 271D to Superior Officer unless he himself arrives at…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

New Tax Regime benefit allowed in view of direction of SC despite belated Form 10IE

New Tax Regime benefit granted despite belated filing of Form 10IE in view of directions of Supreme Court for exclusion…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Revenue can’t take advantage of mistakes of assessee, ITAT remands claim of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) to AO

Revenue can not take advantage of mistakes of assessee, ITAT remands claim of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) to AO In a…

3 days ago