Income Tax

Loans without permission from Charity Commission no reason to deny registration u/s 12A

Objection of CIT(E) for loans taken without prior permission from Charity Commission was no reason for denial of registration u/s 12A – ITAT

In a recent judgment, ITAT Nagpur has held that objection of CIT(E) with regard to loans taken without prior permission from Charity Commission was no reason for denial of registration u/s 12A of the Act being not in the nature of material non-compliance for achieving object of trust.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
5115 (2026) (04) abacus.in ITAT

The assessee was a charitable institution and operating three educational institutions. The assessee aggrieved by the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) passed under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) rejecting application filed for regular registration u/s. 12AB r.w.s. 12A(1)(ac)(vi).   

In this case, assessee had filed an application in Form No. 10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act seeking registration u/s 12AB.  The CIT(E) called for various details to verify genuineness of activities, compliance with other applicable laws and donation-related details.

The CIT(E) observed some deficiencies about non-submission of authenticated trust deed and permission for loans u/s 36A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act (MPT).  The assessee contended that loans were temporary and did not require prior permission and the donations were small contributions from students.  

The CIT(E) did not find favour with the submissions made by the assessee and rejected the application and cancelled the provisional registration.

The Tribunal observed that the objections of the CIT(E) for non-grant of registration were on twofold. One that donation amount cannot be considered as voluntary contribution and second loan & advances obtained were without prior sanction from Charity Commissioner which was noncompliance being material for the purpose of achieving its object. 

The Tribunal observed that considering the gross receipts of more than three crores, nominal amounts of donation received cannot be said to be not voluntary contribution as held by CIT(E).  The observation of CIT(E) was based on no adverse evidence brought on record.  Therefore, it was no reason for denial of grant of registration u/s 12A of the Act.

With respect to loans and advances, the Tribunal noted that details of the same were available in audited financial statements.  It was explained that the aforesaid amount was receipt from the employees and associates for meeting contingencies and were not loans and advances taken on interest as envisaged in terms of provisions of section 36A of Maharashtra Public Trust Act. The Tribunal opined that In any case, prior sanction of Charity Commissioner is not in the nature of material non-compliance for achieving object of trust.

The Tribunal further noted that the issue of loans accepted without compliance of section 36A of Maharashtra Public Trust Act had been considered by the Bench. Following it the Tribunal held that the objection of the CIT(E) with regard to loans taken without prior permission from Charity Commission was no reason for denial of registration u/s 12A of the Act. 

Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(E) and directed to grant registration u/s 12A of the Act to the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • consumer-protection

Compensation to borrower upheld as bank did not verify construction progress before loan disbursals to builder

Bank was liable to pay compensation to borrower as it did not verify the progress of construction before loan disbursals…

12 hours ago
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward arrest order & material in possession to Adjudicating Authority

No timeline mentioned in PMLA to forward the arrest order and the material in possession to the Adjudicating Authority. It…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Release of seized assets if mandatory on completion of 120 days? Question referred to Larger Bench

Whether the release of seized assets is mandatory upon completion of 120 days –High Court refers the case to a…

1 day ago
  • Uncategorized

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31/10/2026

EPFO Extends date of filing of new ECR for the wage month September to 31st October 2026 Taking into account…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Earlier acceptance is relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation of fictitious investment

Earlier acceptance of investment is a relevant evidence in evaluating subsequent allegation that investments were fictitious from inception – High…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

A bald statement recorded during survey can not be basis for any addition

A bald statement recorded during survey would not in itself be a foundation for any addition - ITAT In a…

4 days ago