Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) for PF deposit on next working date due to national holiday

Due to national holiday, deposit of PF on next working date is in due compliance with the provisions of section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT 

In a recent judgment, ITAT Chandigarh has held that the due date being the national holiday, the deposit of employee’s share of PF contribution on the next working date shall be in due compliance with the relevant statue and nothing adverse can be held against the assessee by way of invoking the provisions of section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
4326 (2024) (11) abcaus.in ITAT Chandigarh

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming disallowance on account of delay in deposit of employee’s share of PF contribution under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

It was submitted that the due date of deposit of employee’s share of PF contribution fell due on National Holiday i.e, on 15th August and given that, the assessee had deposited the said contribution on the next working day i.e; 16th August. It was submitted that this fact was not under dispute and same was apparent from the impugned order wherein the CIT(A) had referred to the contents of the tax audit report so submitted by the assessee.

It was submitted that since the due date falls on a date which was National Holiday, the deposit could have been made only on the day following the National Holiday and the assessee duly complied with its obligation and had made necessary compliance on next day.

It was further submitted that exactly identical matter came up for consideration before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court wherein the question of law was as to whether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal misdirected on facts and in law in holding that the amount payable towards ESI fall for due on National Holiday and therefore the deposits made on the following day was amenable to deduction. It was submitted that the Hon’ble Delhi High Court decided the matter in favour of the assessee.

The Tribunal observed that the assessee company had deposited the PF contribution which was falling due on 15th August on the next working day i.e; 16th August. It held that the due date being the national holiday, the deposit on the next working date shall be in due compliance with the relevant statue and nothing adverse can be held against the assessee by way of invoking the provisions of section 36(1)(va) of the Act.

In the result, the disallowance so made by the CPC/AO and upheld by the CIT(A) was deleted and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Assessee developing infrastructure facility of Govt. not contractor for denying 80IA deduction

Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional PCIT/CIT to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s 12A

Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in making addition by adopting extrapolation without any material evidence

AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers decided by CoC

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When quantum appeal restored, penalty can’t be levied for non-payment of demand

When quantum appeal stands restored to the AO, penalty can not be levied u/s 221(1) of the Income Tax Act…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Even in case of bogus purchases, entire purchases cannot be disallowed – ITAT

Even if, the assessee is engaged in the bogus purchases, the entire purchases cannot be disallowed - ITAT In a…

4 days ago