Tag: Section 36(1)(va)
No disallowance for delayed deposit of PF/ESI prior to judgment of Supreme Court Disallowance of u/s 36(1)(va) for delayed deposit of employees share of PF/ESI contribution prior to the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court being debatable, CPC could not have made adjustments u/s 143(1) – ITAT In a …
Delay in deposit of PF/ESI for disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) to be calculated from the month of actual payment of salary not accrual. ITAT remands case for examination ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3781 (2023) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Checkmate Pvt. Ltd. vs. CITKanoi Paper and Industries Ltd. …
Date of actual payment of salary to be considered for disallowance of EPF u/s 36(1)(va) for delay in deposit within 15 days – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3732 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. Vs CIT-1, 143 taxmann.com 178 (SC)Primary Agricultural Cooperative …
Employers contribution not covered under Supreme Court order in case of Checkmate. Payment by cheque within due date allowed by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3721 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Checkmate Services P. Ltd. vs CIT ABCAUS 3614 (2022) (09) SCAlom Extrusions Ltd. 185 TAXMAN …
Mistake by CA in Tax Audit Report if demonstrated with relevant material enough, Insistence of correction in audit report is not justified ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3654 (2023) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws covered:Checkmate Services Pvt. Limited vs. CIT In the instant case, the appellant assessee was in …
Disallowance of belated deposit of Employees’ contribution of PF/ESI u/s 43B even if deposited before due date of ITR filing -Supreme Court settles the law ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3614 (2023) (10) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties Allied Motors (P) Ltd. v Commissioner of Income …
Disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) for delayed EPF deposit. Amendment by Finance Act is prospective – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3590 (2022) (05) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Azamgarh Steel & Power vs. CPCCIT vs. AIMIL Ltd. 188 Taxman 265 (Delhi)Vedvan Consultants Pvt. Ltd. vs DCITPCIT vs Pro …
Amendment by Finance Act 2021 for disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) read with u/s 43B retrospective or prospective is debatable & controversial – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3588 (2022) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:CIT vs. Hindustan Electro Graphites Ltd. 243 ITR 0048 (SC)Modern Fibotex India Ltd. & …
Disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) for delayed deposit of employees contribution of EPF. Explanation-5 to section 43B not retrospective – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3532 (2021) (07) ITAT Important case law relied referred:CIT vs. Vijayshree Ltd.CIT vs. Alom Extrusion Ltd. In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the …
NFAC is bound by binding decision of Jurisdictional High Court when AO is situated within territorial and subjective jurisdiction of High court. ITAT urges CBDT to recall all such orders This decision of the ITAT covered four appeals filed by the assessees, feeling aggrieved by the order passed …
