Income Tax

Pooja Expenses are allowable business expenditure u/s 37 of Income Tax Act

Pooja Expenses incurred allowable business expenditure under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – ITAT 

In a recent judgment, ITAT Nagpur has held that Pooja Expenses incurred were allowable business expenditure under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
4311 (2024) (11) abcaus.in ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer holding that the pooja expenses are not business expenditure.

The assessee company was engaged in the business of manufacturing of industrial products. It filed its return of income for the relevant Assessment Year. Books of account were subject to audit under Companies Act and section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”).

The case was opened for scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) of the Act. The Assessing Officer made addition being Pooja Expenses incurred at the factory premises, holding that the same were not business expenses and hence not allowed as deduction. The assessee was not satisfied with the order passed by the Assessing Officer and hence filed appeal before the first appellate authority.

The CIT(A) confirmed the order passed by the Assessing Officer holding that the expenditure was not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business of the assessee company.

Before the Tribunal the assessee submitted that the Pooja Expenses incurred during festivals like Ram Navami, Navratri, Diwali, Vishwakarma, etc. Evidences were produced relating to the claim. The assessee had also appointed one Poojari for daily office Pooja on monthly payment basis to ensure maintaining positivity in working environment.

The Tribunal observed that the issue under consideration was appropriately considered by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal wherein similar issue was decided by the Bench in favour of the assessee. In the said case, the assessee had relied upon the CBDT Circular No. 17(F.No.27(2)-IT/43) dated 6-5-1983 & Circular No.13A/20/68-IT-II dated 3-10-1968, wherein, it was emphasized that expenses incurred on the occasion of Diwali and Muhurat are in the nature of business expenditure.

The Tribunal, relying upon the said jurisprudence, held that Pooja Expenses incurred were allowable under section 37 of the Act. The Revenue could not bring out any cases favouring the Revenue.

Accordingly, the ITAT set aside the impugned order passed by the CIT(A) by allowing all the grounds raised by the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

PCIT cannot invoke the revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 on instance of Assessing Officer

PCIT cannot invoke the revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act upon a proposal from the Assessing Officer…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO can’t disturb income returned by assessee, without issue of notice u/s 143(2) – ITAT

If AO intends to disturb income returned by assessee, it is mandatory on his part to issue notice under section…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Source of cash being sales proceeds of household items upon sale of flat is plausible

Source of cash deposit being sales proceeds of household items upon sale of flat was held plausible and addition u/s…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CPC was not justified in making the disallowance u/s 40a(ia) for non deduction of TDS

TDS deductibility being debatable issue and not an apparent incorrect claim, CPC was not justified in making the disallowance In…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition when cash deposited in bank was available as cash in hand in the books

No addition when cash deposited in bank was out of cash in hand available with the assessee and AO could…

1 day ago
  • arbitration

Use of word “can” in arbitration clause not a binding arbitration agreement –SC

Use of word “can” in arbitration clause cannot be said to be a binding arbitration agreement –Supreme Court In a…

2 days ago