Tag: business expenditure
Disallowance of Interest on TDS u/s 37(1) is outside the purview of Section 143(1). ITAT allows interest as business expenditure ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3712 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon :M/s. Hebe Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.M/s. Govindam Clearing Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCITDCIT vs. M/s Narayani …
It is impossible to maintain list of gifts given and demonstrate that a particular sales order was received as a result of a particular gift ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3330 (2020) (07) ITAT In the instant case, appeal had been preferred by the assessee against order passed by …
TDS payable as at year end is allowable expenditure in cash basis of accounting. it can not be said that the above sum had not been paid by the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3152 (2019) (09) ITAT In the instant case, an appeal was filed by the …
A company cannot have any personal expenditure. ITAT deleted ad hoc disallowance on vehicle running and maintenance expenditure ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3146 (2019) (09) ITAT In the instant case, one of the issue was related to ad-hoc disallowance being 10% of the vehicle repairs and maintenance expenditure. …
If business not closed down, expenses allowed u/s 37(1) even if turnover was low as it was temporary lull which assessee was trying to revive – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3113 (2019) (08) ITAT The instant appeal had been filed by the assessee against impugned order passed …
Assessee is eligible for the deduction of the amount embezzled by the employee as a trading loss u/s 28 of the Income Tax Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3103 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Dinesh Mills Ltd. 254 ITR 673 The appeal had …
Kind of expenditure a legal professional can legitimately and justly claim is entirely different from basic expenditure a commercial entity can claim – SC dismisses SLP of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2713 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Shanti Bhushan v. Commissioner of …
ITAT explain the expression wholly and exclusively used in section 37. ‘Wholly” relates to quantification and “exclusively” refers to the motive, objects and purpose of the expenditure. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2616 (2018) (11) ITAT The appellant assessee was in appeal before the Tribunal against order of …
Penalty imposed by Supreme Court for illegal mining held compensatory in nature and allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2600 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Essel Mining & Industries Ltd vs. Addl. CIT ACIT vs. …
Voluntarily charity not business expenditure u/s 37(1). Mere assertion that it was incurred for business cannot be accepted without establishing nexus – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1266 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner of Income …
